Penguins
3 Penguins Thoughts: Ponomarev Future, Bad Trades

NEWARK — After a horrible start, the Pittsburgh Penguins were increasingly good Friday against the New Jersey Devils. The Penguins scored four unanswered goals and turned another sad performance into their ninth victory in 15 games.
So much for getting a better draft pick, eh?
Instead of dealing with a bad loss, coach Mike Sullivan was able to speak of the pride the players show when “pulling the Penguins jersey over their heads. ” Sidney Crosby talked about playing for each other and being accountable to each other despite the lack of playoff payoff.
It was a satisfied dressing room.
For the record, I peppered the Penguins postgame recap with 13 Bruce Springsteen references. But in a sign of the time of season, very few people noticed, or at least very few commented. Postgame recaps are a thing of the past. We continue to do them as a recognition of the industry gone by, for the few people who still read them, and for our partnership with WPXI. Over the last few months, even the Associated Press has essentially dropped the recaps written by reporters. The industry has undergone a revolution in the last seven years, and someday soon, we’ll stop with the old-school recap, but for now, I’ll honor the glory days.
But I digress.
Sullivan announced or showed a few things this week, specifically last night.
3 Penguins Thoughts
1. Vasily Ponomarev’s Future is Cloudy
Ponomarev, 23, is an interesting cat. He speaks English, but he has a (sometimes) fun habit of not addressing the question asked—not even close. For example, I asked him Saturday morning what he wanted to show the team in the last three games of the season. He pondered it for a moment and said, “That the AHL is a good development league.”
OK, um, well, OK.
Here’s his postgame radio hit last night with Joe Brand and Phil Bourque. The boys didn’t know who was joining them; they knew only that a player would walk over and pick up the headset.
Ponomarev is an intense fellow, too.
However, his future remains a bit cloudy. He could become a Bobby Farnham type: a fast, gritty, unpredictable type who drags his team into the fight but sometimes goes over the line. I’ve seen him play that game in Wilkes-Barre/Scranton.
One teammate chuckled at my potential comparison and agreed, “I could see a bit of that.”
Ponomarev could also go the Blake Lizotte-Noel Acciari route and be a defensive conscience who brings a gritty element to the defensive responsibilities. However, if he’s to do that, he’ll need to earn the trust of coaches. Ponomarev played only three shifts in the third period Friday.
Overall, he got a respectable 10 minutes of ice time, but the lack of third period time is a good indicator of where he stands. He needs to earn a bit of trust, and he needs to play with the puck a bit more. He’s a center, but he won only three of his eight faceoffs and didn’t do a good job of transitioning to offense.
Sullivan could have–should have–used him more in the third period. The Penguins are a rebuilding team, and the young Ponomarev is potentially a part of that. Three games remaining in a lost season is absolutely the time to use him in bigger situations.
The coach will need to be cognizant of development in the future.
Ponomarev is most likely a fourth-line winger at the NHL level, but he’ll need to show more aspects of his game so that he’s more than just a scrappy plug who plays hard in the defensive zone. He needs to be a more complete player, or his career path will resemble Farnham’s, too.
2. Other WBS Recalls
When the Penguins were a week-old flat soda pop in the first period, two players—Ponomarev and Emil Bemstrom—skated like it was Game 7.
However, it does seem the ship has sailed for Bemstrom. He played only eight minutes despite the spirited first-period effort.
One player who has seized his recent call-up, though you may not have noticed him too much, is Joona Koppanen. He’s played exceptionally well and has seen his ice time climb to about 15 minutes. He’s big, he’s quick, and he’s responsible. And when he’s had the chance, he’s done solid work in the offensive zone, too.
Depending on the summer moves, he has a real chance to be a 12th or 13th forward next fall. I’ve rather liked his game so far, and it looks like there’s more to give. Based on ice time, Sullivan would agree.
3. Bad Trades
Remember that time when general manager Kyle Dubas traded Michael Bunting and a fourth-round pick to the Nashville Predators for Tommy Novak and Luke Schenn?
The Penguins flipped Schenn to Winnipeg, thus essentially receiving Novak, a 2026 second, and a 2027 fourth-rounder for Bunting. It’s a mediocre trade on paper, in large part because Novak has two years remaining on his contract that pays him $3.5 million annually.
That’s a lot of money for a center who registered 24 points in 54 games, including two with the Penguins before his mystery injury didn’t heal as expected, and he was shut down for the season.
No one, including the Penguins, can possibly know what they’ve got. Is Novak the rookie who notched 43 points (17-26-43) in 51 games for Nashville two years ago, or the soft center who had just 22 points in 52 games for Nashville this season?
Dubas couldn’t help himself at the Nashville flea market this season. He accepted Cody Glass and a third-round pick as part of Nashville’s salary dump. Dubas gave up a 2027 fourth-round pick to take a chance on Philip Tomasino. And then Novak.
First, Dubas should probably block Nashville GM Barry Trotz’s number. Trotz was able to dump his unwanted salaries on the Penguins for a few secondary draft picks and get Bunting out of the deal. Obviously, Trotz used that cap space poorly, as Nashville will finish with the third-worst record in the league, but Dubas has done his charity work for the year.
Given Dubas’s stockpile of picks, was Bunting for a second and a fourth a good trade?
Novak could tip the scales in his favor next year, but if he doesn’t, the trade will be another bust for Dubas and just another unwanted salary on the books. Statistically speaking, the acquired second-rounder from Winnipeg has less than a 10% chance of making an impact (defined as 300 career points).
Next season, the Penguins will have Novak, Kevin Hayes, Danton Heinen, and Noel Acciari taking up more than $11 million and four of 13 forward roster spots. The Penguins also own Connor Dewar’s and Tomasino’s restricted free agent rights, so it could be six spots.
The Penguins’ other RFA, defenseman Conor Timmins, who was acquired from Toronto with Dewar, has done little to distinguish himself as a reliable D-man. Add Ryan Graves, who has four more years on his contract, and the Penguins’ roster projects to be a bloated, hapless redux of this season’s failure.
Unless Dubas finds a way to cast aside many of the above.
Dubas will need to be on his game this summer. If the Fenway Sports Group is in “the mode of being impatient,” then season three must be the pivot. If it is not, this rebuild will take much longer than anyone wants.
BS…Timmins has been their best defenseman during the winning streak,a must keep for next year.
Agreed. I’ve watched every game, and Timmons certainly passes the eye test. He’s got size, skates well, and has some snarl to his game. In 15 games averaging 18 mpg, he’s +6. And a lot of his ice time has been playing on his off side. Not sure what else could be expected.
Agree, don’t understand Dans dislike of Timmons. He’s a solid 3rd pair NHL Dman. Expecting him to play over 20 minutes a night at this point isn’t in the top 4 would be an issue.
Timmins has been decent but also inconsistent. He makes some serious gaffes from time to time. The good outweighs the bad from him though, and considering dewar has produced better then expected, it’s shown to be a fair trade value wise. For next season, if timmins can be a steady #5 that can play up in a pinch, the trade is a win.
The Bunting deal was a steal, got a better and cheaper player under team control for an additional year. Also, he ended up getting two 3rd round picks out of taking on Cody Glass for 6 months. You’re and absolute clown.
What color is the sky in your world. I suppose tariffs are good for the stock market too? Here is some knowledge for you. In the 12 drafts from 2005-2016, 33% of picks between 45-60 played 200 games in their career and only 8% or 2 on average each year scored 200 points in their career. That pick really has next to no value to the NHL team. For the 3rd round picks, 2 players in the 3rd round each year played 200 games and 1 had 200 points. We’re talking Zach Aston Reese here. Bunting has far more potential… Read more »
Rumor has it that the Pens thought Bunting wasn’t the sharpest knife in the drawer. Too many stupid penalties and thought less play.
I was at the penguins/ golden Knights game in early March after trade deadline. I watch Novak for the first time and it was only one game but I was very impressed with how he played. Novak and Tomasino will make a nice third line next season the only question will be who will be their left winger?.
You saw things I did not
I’m not sold on KD
Question some of his trades.
We’re you sold on Hexy, and trader Jim that was developing Alzheimers.
Bunting didn’t bring it every night. I think that was the issue. Dubas loved him in Toronto and it was the reason he brought him to Pittsburgh, so there’s a problem somewhere. He was a positive on the PP but pretty much useless 5 on 5.
I’ll have to mostly disagree. While it’s debatable dubas could have acquired more for bunting, it’s a stretch to call that a bad trade. The jury is out on Novak, but bunting was underperforming and his fit was questionable here to begin with. The 3 Trotz trades could all be easily considered wins for the pens… Taking on glass and a 3rd, to then flip for another 3rd is an excellent display of creating something out of nothing. Tomasino showed flashes.. with 10g 10a in 48 games, more then fair value for a 4th. Still young enough to take another… Read more »
It’s difficult when you feel Trapped between the Glory Days and the present when deciding how to run your business and the post-game reports, but because we might not comment every Night does not mean we aren’t reading reports. Sometimes that’s just The Way it is.
I actually like every single trade Kyle has made. Hard to find one that wasn’t a win in some way. Karlsson- a win by subtraction. None of the players traded away were going to help the team. Petry-Ha, Rutta-overpriced third pair d, Granlund-didnt fit at all, Desmith-Ned is better. Karlsson hasn’t fit either, but he has been way better than any of those guys who were traded out. Who would rather have Petry?!?! Glass-he was solid defensively but provided no offense. The picks should be used wisely. Hayes-can anyone say anything bad about him? Solid 3rd/4th liner does his job,… Read more »
With regards to Trotz, I’ve had the idea that he could be a means of disposing of Ryan Graves. He’s got a D that didn’t work out (Brady Skeji), whom we could conceivably glow-up and flip in a year?
I was actually very stoked about Novak, mostly because Dimitri Filipovic of the Hockey PDOCast thinks the sun rises and sets on him
All the Preds fans on x were pissed Novak was part of the trade. Hopefully it’s telling us something.
Having grown up in Jersey, I got every Springsteen reference. My only reaction was at least it wasn’t Bon Jovi.
NEVER
Dan, after reading the comments here and other places, I think that readers/commenters are placing far too much value on late 2nd round picks and anything beyond. There are diamonds in the rough, but you’re lucky to have 1 3rd rounder every 5 years amount to anything.
Also, I think Timmons has potential. But I thought that about Shea and St. Ivany last year too.
timmons would be an ok 3rd pair D, but playing him up in the lineup isn’t ideal – especially, if he has to be the defensive conscience for letang or karlson. I was hoping that all of those acquired 2nd & 3rd round picks could be used as trade fodder to bring in some young talent, but they may have to be used to get rid of some older baggage. FGMRS(RIP) had some luck with his picks, but his successors… haven’t.
and, dan, I like the post game recaps.
The bunting trade, had Sully written all over it. Rutherford left because Sully wanted to be the GM. if KD continues to follow suit, he won’t last long.
I really don’t know where you folks get this stuff.
With a fourth line of Dewar, Lizotte and Accari next season and Imama also with the big club unless Dubas trades Heinen before next season I see Ponomarev being traded due to he is no longer waiver exempt.
Imama and his 5 minutes of playing can go elsewhere.
No one is trading for Pono. If he doesn’t make the team next year and has to pass waivers so be it.
Good stuff Dan, I feel Ponomarev is going to be part of a trade this summer. If he was in the plans, he would have made a bigger impression on Sullivan. Sullivan doesnt see it in the same way he doesnt see it Pustannen or Poulin. Not saying he is wrong, but once he designates a player to that house. They dont get out. I have seen Novak play enough in Nashville too, to know as skilled as he is. Pitt fans will grow weary of his avoidance to contact. You haven’t seen soft until you watch him play. His… Read more »
Enjoyed your take on Vasily Ponomarev!
Hey Dan I luv the pos5 game analysis. I normally don’t comment but I read and definitely watch on YouTube. This fan wants the coverage.
Thank you.
DÃ n man that forward analysis nails it. I respect the guys efforts skating but I don’t care. Skate you ass off but if you don’t score you are useless if you aren’t assisting or in a 4th line role like Accari where you are a pest and shot absorber.
Great article Dan lots here. Dubas is becoming a trade chump. Taking other teams used junk. Commiting long term bloated cash to Bums. He needs to be smarter. I agree if the trend continues this GM may be a younger Hextall.