Penguins Trade Bait; Playing Chicken With Daniel Sprong
Connect with us

Penguins

Penguins Trade Bait: Playing Chicken With Daniel Sprong

Published

on

What to do with Daniel Sprong?

The Pittsburgh Penguins off-season began one month ago. Players have had time to sleep, rest and hop aboard Phil Kessel’s new boat. Now, the NHL off-season has officially begun and trade talks leading up to the NHL Draft June 22-23 will intensify. Jim Rutherford will undoubtedly be a part of those talks.

The Penguins prospect Sprong is no longer waiver exempt. His time in the minors is over unless no NHL team is willing to gamble a roster spot on a 21-year-old, point-per-game player in the AHL with a wicked shot but a discombobulated defensive awareness. So the Penguins have only a few options remaining.

The Penguins could hang on, hope Sprong cracks the NHL roster and is a capable, positive contributor whose defense significantly improves. They could make an assuredly losing bet they can sneak Sprong through waivers to allow him to further marinate in the AHL. Or, they could deal him. His trade value will be higher now than if he fails to make the team in October.

Option three is probably the safest. Option one could be the best. Welcome to the game of chicken.

Daniel Sprong Trade Bait?

Trade bait means other teams are willing to offer something as valuable or more valuable in exchange for the asset. Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford stated the Penguins have players “other teams want”, but do the Penguins want to part with those players?

The Penguins have needs but not many trade chips to fill those needs and not enough salary cap space to hit the free agent market with a splash. Other than Sprong, the Penguins tradeable assets include Phil Kessel, Conor Sheary, and perhaps Carl Hagelin.

Sheary had solid underlying analytics but a paltry 30-point season. He will not bring substantial value back to the Penguins. Hagelin’s elite speed and work with Evgeni Malkin proved most valuable and would be difficult to replace. Hagelin adds more value to the Penguins than he would likely bring in return (and the same goes for Bryan Rust).

So, we’re back to Sprong and Kessel.

Injured? You need a lawyer. Call Joshua R. Lamm.

It seems to be a recipe for disaster for a team which struggled defensively to roll with a pair of right wings who are defensive liabilities. Nay, at times nightmares. High scoring teams can afford one such player. But two? Scoring 100 points does not help if the player’s lack of responsibility leads to 101 goals-against.

This town may not be big enough for the both of them.

Penguins Needs

The Penguins are no longer the best team in the Eastern Conference. In fact, they may not be in the top three. And, other Metro Division teams like the New Jersey Devils and Philadelphia Flyers are getting better. The Penguins will always have a puncher’s chance with Sidney Crosby and Malkin but, last season, the Penguins lack of productive wing play and lack of defensive responsibility were fatal.

The Penguins absolute lack of physicality and mediocre wall play from their wings didn’t help much, either. As teams in the Eastern Conference have increased their game speed to play with the Penguins, physical play is again gaining importance. Anyone who watched the Washington Capitals use that part of their game to great advantage in  the Eastern Conference Final and the Stanley Cup Final will recognize the boost it gave them and the momentum it took from their opponents.

So, if Sprong cannot fill the above needs, and in fact may exacerbate the situation, it makes sense that Sprong becomes the bait.

Sprong could be an NHL All-Star, or a journeyman who toils in European leagues with fearsome offensive skill from the perimeter. Or neither. The Penguins are out of time to allow Sprong to develop at his own pace.

In fact, given the trade talk which surrounds Kessel, the Penguins have a pair of choices. But it’s probably an either-or situation. Keeping Kessel and Sprong is unlikely to yield more favorable results (this isn’t 1985) than obtaining balance by acquiring assets to fill other needs. So, trading one makes logical sense.

Perhaps the Penguins could flip Sprong as part of a package for another talented struggling player. Ahem, Arizona?

Or the Penguins could lose Sprong for nothing, which doesn’t seem to be a good option either. The Daniel Sprong game of chicken is underway. The NHL Draft is eight days away.

 

 

 

Subscribe to PHN Extra

Pittsburgh Hockey Now owner, formerly 93.7 The Fan, Sportsnet Hockey Tonight. Catch Dan tweeting @theDanKingerski and the official @pghhockeynow account.

7 Comments

7 Comments

  1. Jay

    June 14, 2018 at 9:22 am

    With all due respect Dan y would a NHL GM trade for Sprong unless its for a bargain? He is still unproven for the nhl level.

    • Dan Kingerski

      June 14, 2018 at 9:27 am

      Fair question. Because he has a world of potential. A team like AZ or another non-playoff contender could see the opportunity to snare a player before he reaches peak cost. That package could be a draft pick, a fading player the Penguins like, similar to Jamie Oleksiak, or a talented player struggling…again, ahem AZ.

  2. John

    June 14, 2018 at 12:05 pm

    Trading Kessel & Letang makes the most sense with Penguins cap options. Sprong would be great for the cap. I remember when the late great GM Bill Torrey and Al Arbour had a similar conundrum in the 1977 NHL draft. Islanders were deciding to draft a gifted scorer Mike Bossy or a more defensive talented forward. I think his last name was Foster. Arbour reasoned Bossy’s offensive skill and talent worth the high draft pick. They could teach Bossy or another O skilled player enough defense. Bossy delivered 9 50 goal seasons and 4 straight Cups for the Islanders. Similarly, I think PENS coaches can teach Sprong enough D for his O skills. Kessel will be 31 in October. He collected 92 points and would be trading him at high point. Kessel’s durability and game streak a real plus for a Cup contender. I would hate to see Phil be traded but he helped bring the Penguins 2 Cups. Mission accomplished! Agree DK PENS need a more physical presence that was lossed in the Cole and Reaves trades. Saying all that, PENS still were in OT Game 6 vs. Capitals. Let’s say Sid or Geno had scored in Game 6. All the pressure would have been on the Capitals Game 7. PENS have to make the right moves but they don’t have a crystal ball. Trading Kessel & Letang opens millions in cap space and makes the team younger. It makes too much sense in a pro sports business sense. John

    • gerald gilbert

      June 14, 2018 at 5:43 pm

      Good idea! trade our best wing and defenseman for cap space that won’t even be enough sign the best FA W and D on the market and they aren’t even as good as kessel and letang! I gotta ask. Are you a flyers fan?

      • Man

        June 14, 2018 at 10:48 pm

        How pretel would 14.05 M not sign the best player on the market? Also Letang is not our best d anymore. Schiktz and Dumoulin r better. Letamg was never worth 7.25 M. Trading Kessel is not an awful idea. Ups and downs to both side. Trading letang was a fantastic idea two years ago. Ur just closed minded

  3. Dean A

    June 14, 2018 at 4:18 pm

    Why is it that every pens asset is undervalued?

    Reading yours and recent articles by other columnist it would be difficult to get someone to take even Kessel.

    Kessel is an elite player only costing $6.8M a year. He would make almost every team’s power play better and on almost every team he would be a huge upgrade to the first and second line RW.

    Let’s look at 21-year-old Sprong that you want to give up on.

    They say that it is harder to put up points in the AHL than in the NHL. Sprong has shown at every level of hockey that he played that he can score. He would have led the AHL in scoring if he would not have missed the games while in the Burgh. You don’t teach scoring.

    You would also think that every top 6 winger in the NHL is a great two way player. You are wrong, most of them are not. The Pens will be ok with both Sprong and Kessel. Just have a defensively responsible center and left wing (like Guentzel Crosby to play with Sprong).

    The pens should move a few players this off-season, however Sprong is not one of them.

    Sheary, Hagelin, Hunwick, and Kuhnhackl at minimum. You glass half full guys, don’t worry, Sheary and Hagelin have plenty of value. I would also consider Kessel, Brassad, Maatta, and Simon too.

    It is time to use the assets we have to get younger and fill in the missing pieces for the next 2-3 years.

    • Dan Kingerski

      June 15, 2018 at 1:13 pm

      At no point in the article did it suggest giving up on Sprong.

Leave a Reply

Get PHN Extra

PHN Extra

Never Miss a Post!

Enter your email to get all of our articles sent straight to your inbox.

Advertisements

@pghhockeynow

%d bloggers like this:

Join PHN Extra!

Join PHN Extra today for exclusive content from Dan and Shelly plus a completely Google ad-free experience.

PHN Extra

Or enter your email below to sign-up for our mailing list.

Thank you!

Something went wrong.

No thanks. I don't want.

Send this to a friend