Penguins Trade for Cap Space Finally, the Wrong Trade Started it All
Connect with us

Penguins Analysis

Penguins Trade for Cap Space Finally, the Wrong Trade Started it All

Published

on

Penguins trade Phil Kessel, Carl Hagelin
Phil Kessel (left) Carl Hagelin (right). Hagelin photo by Michael Miller

The Pittsburgh Penguins trade of $4 million defenseman Erik Gudbranson Friday was an exchange of an asset for salary cap space. The Penguins received a seventh-round pick in 2021 and Andreas Martinsen, a 29-year-old minor leaguer with 152 games NHL experience. The physical returns pale in comparison to the real get. The Penguins got salary cap space.

Rookie John Marino had supplanted Gudbranson in the Penguins lineup, despite Gudbranson’s significantly improved play since being acquired last February. It looked like Gudbranson had found his hockey home, but that’s sports. When a younger, cheaper option arrives on a team that can’t afford a free lunch, trades happen.

With Gudbranson’s $4 million off the books, the Penguins are no longer in salary cap hell. They now have real and useable salary cap space. When the team eventually gets their lineup on the ice together and figures out what they need, they will have the cap space to make moves.

But it was a situation started by one bad trade.

In November of the 2018-19 season, the Penguins were sputtering and stale. After a summer of denying that locker room problems existed, the Penguins were in the midst of one-win in 10 games streak. Things were ugly. It was the first time since back-to-back Stanley Cup championships in which the Penguins looked in the mirror and wondered if they were good enough.

They weren’t.

Penguins GM Jim Rutherford used his appearance on the team radio show to fire a shot across the bow of his team and threaten another Penguins trade. He called them “stale” and threatened changes. Those locker room problems which had begun the season before were creating distractions inside and sloppy play on the outside.

In May 2018, PHN first published the story, “Lid Comes Off Phil Kessel Situation.” The situation had been festering and it bled into the 2018-19 season. Things were not going well and there was not a strong locker room.

“I wonder if this group has been together too long,” Rutherford said. “And maybe we need to change it up. And that’s what I’ll watch for in the next few games,” Rutherford said in Nov. 2018.

Yet the Penguins denial and attempts to work around the issues set off the chain of events that are now complete. Rutherford should have dealt Kessel when he had the chance, and some in the Penguins organization pushed for it at the 2018 NHL Draft.

Instead, Rutherford attempted to shake the Penguins room by trading a veteran, rather than the major surgery needed. He dealt LW Carl Hagelin to LA for the ultra-vanilla Tanner Pearson. Hagelin was a part of the Penguins’ inner core. On the ice, he was fast and provided space and pucks for his centers, Evgeni Malkin, or whoever would pivot the third line. But Rutherford needed a shakeup, and Hagelin was a pending UFA and didn’t waste much ink on the scoresheet.

RedBeard's Pittsburgh

Pearson was stumbling in LA after being part of their most recent Stanley Cup championship in 2014. Last season was the first year of his four-year, $3.75 million contract and it did not start well. He had precisely one assist in the first 17 games and was a minus-nine.

So, the Penguins swapped a popular core figure for a younger scoring winger amid an ice-cold slump. And the Penguins equalized the salary in the deal by eating a small portion of Hagelin’s $4 million paycheck. But Pearson didn’t provide more scoring for the Penguins, nor did he provide many contributions at all.

Pearson had three goals in his first five games as a Penguin, but ended his Penguins career with one goal in his final 15 games. His stat line (9g, 5a) in 44 games belied his invisibility, which was the opposite of Hagelin, who stat line typically belied his essential contributions.

And so the Penguins trade saddled Rutherford with a bland player on a new four-year contract.

The Penguins eventually tried to re-acquire Hagelin until someone in the front office realized teams may not acquire a player if they’re already paying part of their salary.

So, Rutheford again worked the trade phones with the west coast and plucked struggling defenseman Erik Gudbranson from Vancouver for Pearson. Fans had derided Gudbranson in the great Northwest. The big defenseman didn’t fit well with Vancouver’s system, but he was awarded a three-year, $12 million contract anyway. Gudbranson was getting the Jack Johnson treatment.

The trade worked well for the Penguins. Gudbranson formed a solid pairing with Marcus Pettersson and provided shelter for the Penguins star players who had been under assault from more physical opponents. Even rowdy Washington Capitals forward Tom Wilson was on good-behavior when the Penguins and Washington squared off.

But that pesky salary cap thing was in the way and Marino needed space.

Rutherford made a leap of faith in July. He bought Brandon Tanev, the shiny new toy, at full price, assuming that things around the NHL would work as they always have. He would be able to dump salary upon a rebuilding team in exchange for an excess asset. But those things didn’t materialize over the summer. The rebuilding teams realized there were far more teams which needed to dump salary than teams able to accept it.

So the situation dragged on…and on. Rutherford’s primary choice to deal was Jack Johnson.

“We all know the situation in here,” Johnson told PHN on the eve of the regular season as he firmly denied he was told he was involved in a pending deal.

But two bad trades begot a third. The Penguins had to dump salary and Gudbranson’s contract made him a prime candidate. If Marino continues upon this development path and anchors the right side of third pairing with swift skates and some offensive push, the Penguins won’t miss Gudbranson. The gamble is a good one for the Penguins.

Everything has been undone. Tanev has replaced Hagelin in the lineup, and the salaries of Pearson and Gudbranson are gone. It took nearly 12 months to do and undo the situation, which should have been solved by trading Kessel in the first place. The return for Kessel would have been much greater, and the lingering and exacerbated problems which eventually sunk the 2018-19 Penguins could have been solved.

It was a long detour but it’s all done. Finally.

Editors Note: The original version incorrectly stated the Penguins had a 10-game winless streak in Nov. 2018. The streak was one win in 10 games. 

Subscribe to PHN+

Pittsburgh Hockey Now owner, formerly 93.7 The Fan, Sportsnet Hockey Tonight. Catch Dan tweeting @theDanKingerski and the official @pghhockeynow account.

11 Comments

11 Comments

  1. Nolan

    October 26, 2019 at 11:10 am

    I disagree I don’t think A bad trade started the penguins losing I think bad defense and injuries hurt them if the front office I would go out and get better defenseman they would be better because Crosby and Mallon contracts are reasonable compared to the league now letang is good but hurt a lot add defenseman depth

  2. Edgar

    October 26, 2019 at 1:18 pm

    Why do you gotta go there, Dan? That hurt when they traded my man Hags. Maybe he best ancillary player in the entire league. Excels at everything-except scoring. And I love Sully, and I know what he was trying to do, but when he put Hags on Geno and Phil’s line, all it did was frustrate the fans and give our awful GM a chance to get rid of him cause Hags wasn’t scoring with those guys.
    I have to say, what started it all for me was the Riley Sheahan deal. We needed a 3rd line center so we got this guy. But this started a trend of filling holes with guys just not good enough to be cup winners. Sheahan, Oleksiak, Gudbranson. These guys all filled holes. And were the attempt to keep the team afloat. But, your (most likely) not winning a cup with them. And now, they’re all on your team. So, you’ve actually hurt your team in the long run, even if you feel you have improved your team!

    • Dan Kingerski

      October 26, 2019 at 6:53 pm

      That’s a solid response, Edgar. I also circle the Sheahan deal as an inexplicable decision. After a summer of shopping, they acquired a center who is essentially a bubble player/journeyman.

      • Edgar

        October 26, 2019 at 8:43 pm

        I live in the NY area and I watch Hags often and I knew we would love him. What better place for a go like him who can’t score with a team that already has Sid, Geno, and Phil? Perfection. Then he chips in the offensive time of his life in the 2015 playoffs! Yowza!!

  3. BIG B

    October 26, 2019 at 3:40 pm

    Awful GM Edgar are you nuts with his two stanley cups and two more 100 point seasons after that.The picking up of Mccann,Bjugstad,Petterson,Marino ETC ETC ETC show he is a good ,no a great GM.The pickups of the last year or so like Guddy or Sheahan got this team over the hump when they would have missed the playoffs.You can’t just go and get who you want because your teams need it as somebody has to give you what you want for the price you want.

    This shows what i always said is Pittsburgh fans are spoiled and fickle because nowhere else would the GM get this his hate with his success.The same crap Bylsma and Shero got because they only won one cup and had the most wins in the leauge for their combined tenure.All we heard is we lost to inferiors in the playoffs yet the fans ignored they were hurt almost every playoff season. It is hard to win the cup but apparently nobody here understands that.Look at Doug Wilson in San Jose or Poille in Nashville with two great GM’s who won squat.Three straight GM’s have won the cup here and been insulted by spoiled entitled fans or keyboard GM’s who ignore the facts.Good luck if you get your way and turns this team into the Pirates.

    • Edgar

      October 26, 2019 at 3:54 pm

      I may be nuts!! I had no issue with Dan or Shero. Liked them both. Yes, results speak, no doubt and Rutherford gets credit for that and won with Carolina. Not many GM’s have done that, but, buy, oh boy, I don’t like him. And the Hags trade is a perfect example. Ridiculously bad idea. I mean, talk but nuts. THAT’S nuts!!!
      I think it’s unfair to label me fickle or spoiled because I do not agree with many of the moves Rutherford has made. If I’m not mistaken, and I might be, Jake, Rust, and Sheary were all brought into the organization before he got here, so they weren’t even his moves.
      I’m not interested in “making the playoffs” with our core group. I’d rather miss a year or two than squeeze in. That’s just my feeling. I didn’t even love the McCann/Bjugstad trade because both of those guys had term. Which means we were stuck with them. I’m certainly not blaming them for the loss to the Isles but we could’ve gotten swept without them. Then, we come in to this season with about $5 or $6 million more in cap space and maybe we sign a top winger. Who knows. Instead we were stuck with a team not good enough, and we’re still most likely not good enough.

      • Herman

        October 27, 2019 at 5:43 pm

        What would have been the “right move”?

        Hindsight 20/20 – they move Kessel instead!

        The fan base would have gone Bonkers. There are things that just have to play itself out.

        I think GMJR’s bigger issue is how Pens chance during UFA period.

        I also feel Rutherford tries his best and does fairly well negotiating trades in season.

        • Dan Kingerski

          October 27, 2019 at 6:08 pm

          As we noted on the article, we believe some in the Pens org were in favor of trading Kessel. I also advocated such at the time.

  4. Devin

    October 26, 2019 at 3:50 pm

    Look at this trade tree deeper.
    Martinsen. And a 7th for gudbranson
    Gudbranson for Pearson
    Pearson for hagelin
    Hagelin for perron
    Perron for klinkhammer and a 1rst
    Isles draft Matt barzal with that 1rst

    • Dan Kingerski

      October 26, 2019 at 6:46 pm

      It’s a big what if—Would the Penguins have taken Barzal with that pick? Or would they have avoided a high-end center and opted for a winger/D-man. But, the Perron for a #1 was not a good deal.

  5. b96rohlf

    October 27, 2019 at 7:41 am

    we have two cups because of Phil the Thrill. So I would say it worked out pretty good.

Make your voice heard

%d bloggers like this:

Join PHN Extra!

Join PHN+ today for exclusive content from Dan and Shelly plus a completely Google ad-free experience.

PHN+

Or enter your email below to sign-up for our mailing list.

Thank you!

Something went wrong.

No thanks. I don't want.

Send this to a friend