Connect with us


Breaking Down the Montreal Goals and Who to Blame



Pittsburgh Penguins

TORONTO — It was a brutal night for the Pittsburgh Penguins and another surprising twist in the 24-team NHL playoffs. The Montreal Canadiens were the team with the lowest point total in the tournament, yet they are the ones schooling the Penguins, which had the highest point total among teams in the Qualifying Round.

Montreal rallied from a 3-1 deficit, and Jack Johnson drew the ire of Penguins fans and media alike. Johnson was the last guy on the screen for several goals and was left holding the bag like the guy at the bank robbery who missed the getaway car.

In our never-ending quest to be unpopular, PHN will breakdown the Montreal Canadiens’ goals to examine precisely what went wrong and who went wrong.

GOAL 1. Shea Weber

So many yikes on the play. Jack Johnson wound up on the right point, which means he was on his backhand. That’s a bad start. The Pittsburgh Penguins third line, which has been overrun like a squirrel which didn’t see the oncoming tractor-trailer, pushed the puck in deep. Then Lafferty went back to the point, which was Johnson.

Johnson misplayed the puck, and Montreal transitioned. We’ve circled Weber to show you how far back he was.

Pittsburgh Penguins Jack Johnson


From offensive zone errors to defensive breakdowns. THIS next picture was where the goal was scored. Patrick Marleau raced back. Justin Schultz is also in a good position. Weber is the trailer and gets the 40-foot shot on Murray.

Pittsburgh Penguins


A 40-foot shot should not get a juicy five-foot rebound. This is what’s called a pizza. Pittsburgh Penguins goalie Matt Murray served a hot and ready pizza right back into the slot. Schultz or Marleau should have been on Weber, but…well…they weren’t. And that’s a ghastly mistake.


Pittsburgh Penguins Jack Johnson


Conclusion: Johnson whiffed at the blue line. Marleau and Schultz let Weber breeze past. Murray gave an awful rebound. The mistakes compounded and compounded again.

Goal 2: Jonathan Drouin.

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back our returning champions, Jack Johnson, Justin Schultz, and Patrick Marleau. Evgeni Malkin and Bryan Rust join them. The play was simple enough, Montreal was cycling around the perimeter after a faceoff win. Marleau didn’t go hard enough after a loose puck, and Byron played it the point.


Byron slipped away from Schultz. Malkin broke for the point with the wingers.


Johnson broke for Byron, who was the more immediate threat. I must admit that’s a tight spot for a defenseman. Johnson’s realization that Byron was open and his quick jump towards him probably didn’t leave enough time for Schultz to switch to Drouin, either.  


Conclusion: It had to be a great pass to slip through to Drouin, but Schultz let his man give him the slip while Malkin vacated the low zone and could have been another body to help. We let Johnson slide here.

Goal 3: Paul Byron Wrap-Around

The overwhelming sentiment is this was Jack Johnson’s fault. So, let’s break it down, and there is one moment, and literally only a moment, that will change your perception.

Byron beat John Marino on the wall. We could make excuses for Marino because he’s earned a few hall passes. This play will cost him one of those. Byron got by, and here is the moment that changed the play. Notice Johnson turns his head and looks right at Max Domi. Johnson realized the play was a two-on-one and adjusted his path to take away the shot.

That’s a critical point to understand. A defenseman’s job on a two-on-one is to take away the pass and let the goalie focus on the shooter.

Pittsburgh Penguins


Even to the last moment, Johnson couldn’t leave his post or Byron would have been able to slip a late pass to Domi for an easy tap. Johnson didn’t lounge in the crease, he nullified the two-on-one.

However, Jake Guentzel was a little slow to pick up his man, Nick Suzuki, who was then open for a good one-timer.


The next couple of moments were too perfect for Montreal. Murray kicked the save off Johnson, and it caromed to Byron at full speed for the wrap-around. That play could happen 1000 times, and the carom would never again be as perfect.

That seems like the Pittsburgh Penguins luck this series, though you also make your own luck.

Pittsburgh Penguins, Matt Murray, Jack Johnson


Conclusion: A tough play by a tired Marino, and Guentzel needed to take one more stride to nullify the slot chance. The rest? Bad, bad luck and not on Murray like I initially thought. Certainly not on Johnson like many of you thought. That’s a lot of adjustments for Murray to make in a flash. He thought he made the save but didn’t fully have his anchor set.

You might argue Murray should have absorbed the shot instead of kicking it away, but that’s a hard case to prove.

Goal 4?

Montreal defenseman Jeff Petry picked the top corner on Murray, who went to the crouch. No great breakdown there. That’s a sneaky bugaboo in Murray’s game; his technique in that situation has left him vulnerable to several of those goals in his short career.

So, the emotion of the Penguins’ loss combined with the pending doom has created a tense situation. The Penguins have earned that, and we hope this helps clarify the discussion.

Subscribe to PHN+

Pittsburgh Hockey Now Editor-in-Chief, formerly 93.7 The Fan, Sportsnet Hockey Tonight, NHL Home Ice. Catch Dan tweeting @theDanKingerski and the official @pghhockeynow account.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hatrick Pornqvist
Hatrick Pornqvist
2 years ago

The linesman really stuck it to Johnson on that first goal.
Murray’s rebound on the first goal.
Marino getting burned.

The internet (one silly site in particular) is blowing up JJ today. And to be honest he wasn’t good. But I’m glad there’s a voice of reason who will point out the other things that happen.

Murray’s rebound control has been pretty bad all series. Really would like to see Jarry get the nod tomorrow.

Benjamin A
Benjamin A
2 years ago

100% about Jarry! I feel like the switch to him for game 4 could be a big step in getting the series back under control.

Benjamin A
Benjamin A
2 years ago

Great analysis! I wasn’t blaming Johnson for all of them, but I’m glad for the confirmation on the first. This really helped me understand the absolute meltdown that was last night.

2 years ago

Thanks again for clearly explaining all of the Canadian goals. Clears up any mystery or “scapegoating.” Excellent coverage.

Mitch Cumstein
Mitch Cumstein
2 years ago

I’ve been trying for 2 seasons to stay neutral and objective with JJ. I rarely listen to hype, especially when it comes to one player being the reason a team wins/loses. That being said, it has turned into a situation where EVERY time there’s a goal against, #3 is on the ice. If objectivity is the goal (no pun intended), at some point you have to wonder wtf is going on here. I mean the guy is ALWAYS on the ice when bad shit happens.

Join PHN Extra!

Join PHN+ today for exclusive content from Dan, Dave and Shelly plus a completely Google ad-free experience.


Or enter your email below to sign-up for our mailing list.

Thank you!

Something went wrong.

No thanks. I don't want.