Penguins
Penguins Report Card: A Scrappy Good Performance; Crosby Brilliance
PITTSBURGH — After a trio of overtime games, none of which became wins, the Pittsburgh Penguins badly needed a victory. However, facing a team that has beaten, if not embarrassed, them for a few years running was not the most advantageous situation.
The Penguins had lost seven straight to the Edmonton Oilers, and one veteran recently described a few of the games as “getting stomped.” Yet with a strong urgency, the Penguins started fiercely, scrapped to do what they needed to do in the second period to keep a two-goal lead, and continued to attack in the third for a 5-3 win at PPG Paints Arena.
Sidney Crosby and Bryan Rust had three points (1-2-3) as the Penguin’s top line provided most, but not all, of the offense. Drew O’Connor and Kevin Hayes also scored.
“We weren’t just trying to sit back and accept the rush; trying to play defense and trying to clog up the middle or anything like that,” said goalie Alex Nedeljkovic. “We weren’t trying to shut it down. We were just playing our game and playing on top of them. And in doing that (we) did the same thing and shut them down.”
Nedeljkovic was one of the primary stories. Edmonton did not quit, nor did they accept their fate meekly. More than a spoonful of credit should also go to Nedeljkovic, who fought off a couple of sure Edmonton goals with desperate saves. There were no softies or deflating goals from which to rally. Nedeljkovic stopped 40 of 43 shots.
Marc-Andre Fleury, who was named to the Penguins Quarter Century Team, would have been proud of several of Nedeljkovic’s acrobatic saves.
“I just got lucky (on a few of those),” said Nedeljkovic with a laugh. “They made a few good plays … I was happy to be able to get a couple of them. You’d like to maybe be a little more square (and) centered on some of those plays. But they’re good players over there.”
Instead, the Penguins did the stomping on Thursday. Badly needing a win and facing a tormentor, it was not an ideal situation, yet the Penguins specifically did several things that they hadn’t recently done. Not the least of the Penguins’ improvements was finishing their chances.
Sidney Crosby climbed a few more notches in the NHL record book by notching a pair of assists and a power play goal.
Read More: Crosby Continues Assault on All-Time Lists With Big Game
As important as the upgrades to their game to deal with the defending Western Conference champions was the mental ability to wrestle momentum back from Edmonton in the second period. It might be an overlooked feature, but every team fights back, and Edmonton’s pushback is much better than most.
The Penguins stabilized well.
Edmonton kept chipping away, and late in the second period, a controversial penalty for interference to Bryan Rust yielded an Edmonton power-play goal and a mere two-goal lead for the final 20 minutes. The players on both teams may have recognized the folly of the call, but Edmonton wasn’t going to give it back, and Ryan Nugent-Hopkins scored a power-play goal to pull Edmonton to within 5-3.
However, that was the last goal of the game.
Penguins Xs and Os
In the first period, the Penguins did two things especially well: They collapsed around their net and made the gritty plays in the offensive low zone, swarming the Edmonton net.
Edmonton got the edges and got behind the Penguins’ defense, but the forwards collapsed to the hash marks and were able to block several shots or deny the chances for rebounds.
“One of the things we talked about was making sure that we didn’t give them any easy offense. In other words, we didn’t want to be careless with the puck,” said coach Mike Sullivan. “We didn’t want to get beat out of the deep ice in the offensive zone, letting them ramp up speed with numbers. If they were going to enter our zone, we wanted them to have to go through four or five of us to get there; the importance of staying above the attack and staying above the puck … I thought our guys did a good job.”
Make no mistake: Edmonton is a very good team. It wasn’t that the Penguins made a lot of mistakes as much as Edmonton can make the best defensive schemes look ineffective. The Penguins didn’t dominate the puck in the second period, and Edmonton counterattacked at full speed and ferocity.
“We had to elevate our intensity, try to simplify the game, and play straight ahead. Give Edmonton credit. They’re a dynamic team. I thought we did a good job playing on top of them in the first period,” Sullivan said. “We had a lot of offensive zone time. We scored some goals … we were trying to get to get control of the game and get momentum … I thought in the third period we played a pretty solid game.”
Fast-forward to the third period and the Penguins played a game beyond the chalkboard. They raced after loose pucks, battled in the corners, and were generally hard to play against. The high points were Sidney Crosby outracing Edmonton’s defense to negate an icing and fighting through a bearhug by Evan Bouchard. The second line did its best work of the game by cycling low in the right-wing corner for the entirety of a shift immediately following Crosby’s hardnosed play.
Not only did the Penguins kill some clock while leading by two, but they wore down Edmonton and blunted momentum–exactly how it should be done.
Penguins Report Card
Fair warning: I really liked their performance on Thursday. I enjoyed watching the game immensely. That was high-level competitive hockey. It’s a shame a national TV audience didn’t get to see it because it would have made a few more hockey fans. I saw no bad grades to deliver.
Team: A
The cleanest game? Nope. The most structured? Not a chance. But there was a desperation and determination to defend and get the next puck. That’s the mark of a winning team. Whether or not the Penguins can achieve that designation despite their personnel limitations is an unknown question, but they earned their two points Thursday.
One thing to note: despite blowing a couple of third period leads, the Penguins have indeed played well in recent third periods.
“That kill on (Bunting’s third period) penalty was big. Even in those (recent games we lost), we did a pretty good job in the third,” Crosby said. “We played on our toes and made a couple of mistakes–we still made a couple of mistakes (Thursday), but we then got a block or a save or a kill. And you know, sometimes you’ve got to do that.”
Alex Nedeljkovic: A+
There were so many good saves. The desperation glove throw against Evan Bouchard in the first period, the windmill pad save against Zach Hyman (even though Draisaitl finished the rebound), and numerous slides from post to post. The Penguins embodied Nedeljkovic’s fight, and Nedeljkovic embodied the Penguins’ fight for a solid performance.
Sidney Crosby, Rickard Rakell, Bryan Rust: Wow
If they’re not the best line in hockey, they’re close enough. They can score in every way–off the rush, near the crease, and counterattack from stiff defense. They did it all and played against Connor McDavid Thursday.
Owen Pickering-P.O Joseph: A
No goals allowed. Pickering thumped Mattias Janmark at center ice during a particular chippy patch of the game. Joseph skated out of trouble a few times. They didn’t have to guard McDavid too often, but the young guns pairing did their job without struggle.
Bunting-Glass-Beauvillier: Solid
They didn’t score a goal, but they didn’t yield a high-danger chance, either. They got to the net several times and were tough to play against, especially in the third period.
Is it time to hands the reins to Neddy in goal? Got my vote.
And keep Puljujarvi in the line!
Not being a jerk when I ask this, but I am genuinely curious. What did you see from Puljujarvi that really impressed you tonight?
Competed hard at both ends of ice, made nice plays to both clear puck and keep it in zone, was in his spots, and was creating chances with his linemates.
Played a physical but not reckless game, put the puck on net.
Physicality. Hard on the walls. Separated man from puck several times.
He created the turnover that allowed the DOC setup to Hayes, made a couple d-zone plays and had a strong forecheck. Better question is what did you see that you didn’t like.
He was no where near as noticeable as Hayes and DOC on that line. I thought Puljujarvi had probably the weakest performance of all forwards, actually. He’s a big body, but i don’t remember him doing a whole lot.
he was on a line that scored 2 of the 5 goals.
I agree. A bit rough around the edges, but I can name at least 3 players more deserving of a portion of nachos over him.
Eh. He was good tonight. Consistency is an issue. But he should get more starts. I still can’t believe some goofball on his post believes that Bloomquist is better than what we have.
Who is Bloomquist?
I don’t think so. It’s one game and the TEAM actually showed up for the first 10 minutes. Did he play a strong game, heck yeah, but the 2 prior to that against Carolina and especially Detroit were weak.
And Joel as back up.
Yes, it is. He will not be our savior, as we have seen in his previous couple of games. Simply put, he clears the extremely low bar set by Jarry, but there’s not many that can’t do that. At this point, I’m under the impression we could do a lottery with tickets and put the spectator who wins between the pipes. I doubt he/she would do worse than Jarry. On that note, I thought Skinner was older, but then saw he’s 25 last year. When I saw that and his performance last year, I thought Edmonton doesn’t have a goalie… Read more »
I’m sorry to break the news but there are some mentally deficient individuals on these sites who think Jarry is a good goalie. I tried to convince them for two years that he is not. Some hockey fans just aren’t too bright.
Ned is a gamer. He’s not a franchise type goalie to build a dynasty around but he will win some games that would otherwise be losses because of his compete level. TJ is more physically gifted but is fighting it mentally, IMO. I say ride whoever is hot. After last night, that would be Ned.
Why is it that nobody mentions Crosby’s turnovers? It is the best line in hockey, but isn’t every line with Sid the best? His turnover ended up in the back of the net for the first Edmonton goal. No biggie, he more than made up for it and I never would criticize him. Mistakes happen, but should we completely ignore them and never mention them? Karlsson almost complicated the game when he chased the puck, like a cat chases a toy. Fortunately, that puck ended up between Grzelcyk’s skates. It would’ve been a different game if that went in. Fortunately,… Read more »
Dan mentioned it on his YouTube vid.
Haven’t seen the video until after my comment, and that wasn’t his only turnover, just the one that ended in the back of the net. Nevertheless, I repeat, it’s jist noticing what was happening, not a criticism of Crosby’s stellar play. I also heard in the video that our 2nd line did a good 4th line job. Yes, this game was good and I’m happy, but how many games can be won like that? The 3rd line was more of a 2nd line tonight, but are you counting on them to bring it the next 5 games? Also, Jar-Jar will… Read more »
Someone else asked the same question the other day in the comments section. I think everyone is aware. He has been like that his whole career except now it may be more evident because he isn’t as fast and can’t immediately get the puck back.
Yes, there’s that, and he also doesn’t have strong teammates to bail him out, or anyone else for that matter, each and every time.
Gritty win. Ned had an awesome game, despite that whomp whomp Draisaitl rebound after the windmill save. I wish Jarry success, but Ned has a way better attitude.
Will this be enough to keep Jarry on the bench?
Glad that edmontons first shot didn’t end up in the net. That has to be a deflating thing to this team.
This was perhaps the Penguins most physical game of the year. They played hard against the boards, took the body on multiple occasions, and JP played a hard and inspiring game.
The Penguins should’ve gotten four points, they not only beat the Oilers, but beat the officials as well.
I don’t know if this team will sneak into a playoff spot or not but regardless of that, it’s just nice to see them actually competing and playing fun hockey again
When you out goaltend the other team, you have a better than 50% of winning. Kyle, you calling WB?
Keep an eye on the ball. Sell high!!!
Petty and Ned had excellent games. What does Edmonton need????
I get that Dubas has a plan to rebuild, but it does make you wonder how this team could perform with one more sniper. Maybe Kessel is ready to come back and play with Geno. Maybe grab Alex Tuch if Buffalo has really given up, though he is their “local” guy.
Can we find a way to get Brock Nelson? He’s struggled lately with NYI and could use a change of scenery… But I doubt they trade him to a division rival
Actually he’s 33, I take this back
I thought 72 had his best game in a while, and Hayes has been good with OC. 4th line was strong too
DOC is a little puck luck from being a 20 goal scorer. He has had a ton of Grade A scoring chances but very little success so far. Nice to see them starting to go in for him.
Agree–4th line not getting enough credit for their effectiveness. Hayes looks rejuvenated, and plays well with DOC. Beauvillier was hunting pucks all night. He doesn’t look like he weighs more than a buck sixty-five, though, so probably not realistic to expect that from him every night.
Nice to see Petey back to normal. He may have rushed his return from injury a bit, because the blue line was so decimated, but he looks to be 100% now. Strong game.
Ned’s our starter, folks. Until he hits a rough patch. Also, I’ll admit here that POJ had a good game last night. He is a little reckless, and I think they protected him with deployment, but he did well. Pickering looked very strong–even when his skating gets exposed with speed rush attack, he usually is able to use his reach to recover and impact the play.
O’Connor AND Hayes both score and you have no rating for that line.