Kingerski: Jim Rutherford Not Wrong About Penguins Speed or Defense | Pittsburgh Hockey Now
Connect with us


Kingerski: Jim Rutherford Not Wrong About Penguins Speed or Defense



Erik Gudbranson Pittsburgh Penguins Trade Speculation

The sharp exchange last Thursday between a reporter and Pittsburgh Penguins GM Jim Rutherford was as insightful to the Penguins expanded philosophy as it was confrontational to current perceptions. The Penguins have issues to correct and things to fix, but speed isn’t necessarily one of them. Nor is the defense, though all jobs on a team which was swept out of Round One can be upgraded.

The Penguins defense isn’t as fast as it was three years ago. As a group, it’s bigger, tougher, and also has a little less offensive flare. But perceptions of some are the defense was not very good. Others claim the Penguins defense was responsible for the rough seasons of Evgeni Malkin and Phil Kessel, which is a mangling of analytics to deny two players who admitted poor seasons if there ever was.

More than a few think the Penguins team has lost a step but a side by side comparison shows the Penguins speed is equal. The reality is the game has changed.

“Have you been going to the games? Do you think Bjugstad and McCann can skate?” Rutherford snapped to a question about moving from the speed concept.

It’s the truth, even if not popularly accepted. Directly comparing to the 2016 team, is not Bryan Rust as fast as…Bryan Rust? Jared McCann is similar in speed to Carl Hagelin and Nick Bjugstad can cover far more ground than Nick Bonino.

But the defense, right? One commenter on Pittsburgh Hockey Now referred to Rutherford as an idiot if he didn’t know it was the defensemen who were the problem.

“I think our defense is probably the best now that it’s been since I’ve been here, as a group,” Rutherford answered. “You always like mobile defensemen, guys who can move the puck. We have at least one guy in each pairing that can move the puck and now we’ve got guys who can have some pushback.”

Those guys who can pushback are specifically Johnson and Gudbranson. Dumoulin is not a softy, though his forte is proper positioning more than brute strength near the cage. Gudbranson can stand between the Penguins star players and repeated harassment and Johnson was one of the most prolific hitters and shot blockers in the NHL this season.

For any criticisms of Johnson’s offense, it’s hard to credibly argue that Murray’s crease was not significantly cleaner, especially as Johnson gained his Penguins bearings in the second half of the season and was able to get on the right side of the puck (and stopped dumping crease crashers over his goalie).

Draft Kings $200 risk-free bet!

And therein lies Rutherford’s contention. And the truth. The 2016 defense was good with Daley but it was thin and not physical. Teams ran over the Penguins goalies, especially the Washington Capitals. Sullivan and the Penguins goalies (Matt Murray and Marc-Andre Fleury) often spoke of the traffic and the difficulty of physical contact.

By 2017, the Penguins had enough and didn’t think surviving the continued beating was sustainable, so they tried tougher forwards like Ryan Reaves. That didn’t work out. So this season, they added rugged defensemen.

“At one time you asked if we had guys who had enough pushback and now you’re asking if we have enough guys with speed. If you find those guys, they’re $15 million a year and there aren’t any.”

After Rutherford’s statement, headlines flew fast and furious. Social media and the blogosphere went nuts. But Rutherford wasn’t far off, or even wrong.

An illustrative example: Remember 2009-10. In head coach Dan Bylsma’s first full season, the Penguins attempted to revolution the game with a speed defense. Gone was Hal Gill, a big, slow-footed defenseman who was “bad at hockey,” and Rob Scuderi who in 2009 was slow but a capable defensive defenseman who then won two more Stanley Cups with the LA Kings.

One year later, Mark Eaton who was the Penguins last defensive defenseman was also gone. The Penguins went heavy on the mobile route but that group, head coach and GM Ray Shero didn’t contend for another Stanley Cup. The Montreal Canadiens featuring Gill in a prime shutdown role upset the Penguins in 2010.

Sorry to bring up bad memories, but you know what they say about those who don’t learn from history.

Somewhere to the speed and mobility side of the spectrum lays the perfect defense. What so many on the outside are forgetting is the evolution of the league combined with the adjustments made to counter the Penguins. It takes some ugliness to sprinkled into the defense to do some of the dirty work which is necessary. The 2016 opponents weren’t ready for the speed and the Penguins advantage was enormous. That will no longer be possible and the Penguins adjusted.

Defensemen Kris Letang and Justin Schultz made a few high-profile mistakes against the New York Islanders. Those mistakes were magnified by the Penguins lack of offense, pushback, and inability to contain the New York pushback.

But overall, the Penguins blue liners have ingredients they haven’t had perhaps ever before. In addition to the high-end talent, they now have defensemen able to hit back and while they may not have the same wheels as the 2016 club, they’re competent skaters. Rutherford also watched his team shut down opponents for the final six weeks of the regular season.

And oh by the way, Jack Johnson’s advanced analytics continually increased throughout the season. From the Stadium Series game on Feb. 23 until the end of the regular season, Johnson posted positives in the critical categories of scoring chances and goals-for. Even his Corsi was near even.

Subscribe to PHN+

Pittsburgh Hockey Now owner, formerly 93.7 The Fan, Sportsnet Hockey Tonight. Catch Dan tweeting @theDanKingerski and the official @pghhockeynow account.

Advertisement Draft Kings $200 risk-free bet!


  1. RobertU

    April 23, 2019 at 8:39 am

    It’s always bizarre to me how people want to hang onto a belief long after the facts say they should let it go. Trolls, bloggers, and even some reporters cherry pick flawed stats to try to single out one or two players…but it’s a team sport. Solid team defense, positioning, and effort leads to good scoring chances. That’s how hockey works. It’s not the 80s or early 90s anymore where the talented guys just fly down the ice unimpeded and score at will. It’s a game of positioning, effort, and team play – more or less trying to reduce the randomness and luck, while maximizing your team’s opportunity to create an opening. In other words, it’s not just about “go go go” and “teh goalz.” If you need any additional evidence consider the teams that are moving on to the second round. Even the 2016 and 2017 Pens were more about team defense, positioning and effort than pure speed. Speed helped to turn that into offense, but speed wasn’t the engine. This year’s Pens lacked all 3 of those factors. Pens fans, bloggers, and even some of the media are stuck in a different era. Or maybe they just don’t actually watch the games?

  2. Skippy

    April 23, 2019 at 9:25 am

    Don’t kid yourself, the Pens defensemen as a group are below average. The majority are 5-6 pair caliber with the exception on Dumoulin and Letang. It’s not the lack of speed or goal scoring, but instead the inability to win little battles behind the net and along the boards needed to get the puck out. Instead of making the short simple paths, they tend to try to make a more difficult play (See Schultz). Maybe that’s coaching, but I doubt it. Pens should trade Maatta and Bjugstad for a legit top pairing LH Dman.

  3. Dean

    April 23, 2019 at 9:56 am

    Dan I agree that Johnson played better once he was on the left side and he does the best job on the team of clearing the crease.

    However, after a week of reading everyones analysis, I believe that it just comes down to chemistry and commitment to team. The Pens have more than enough talent and speed. The Pens did not have the team chemistry to play at the next level. Lovejoy and Oleksiak playing like all-stars for Dallas is just one example of where it is not about speed, but about 2 bottom pair guys able to play at that next level because the team all went there.

    Just 1 or 2 players can upset team chemistry. The problem or problems may seem obvious to everyone. No matter who it is, Pens should do everything to move those players out.

  4. Edgar

    April 23, 2019 at 11:49 am

    Woo Hoo!! I was the one who said that about Rutherford. But, I’ll agree it’s more than just the defense, It’s a total team commitment to playing that defense. Which is why he was an idiot for trading Hagelin, which turned into Gudbrandson. Ha. What a joke. I’m not a huge stat guy, but, hey why not, let’s look in to some stats. The idea that the Pens are this fast high scoring machine that needs to flo the offense is so flawed, it is people that are stuck in the ’80’s. In the 2016 playoffs, the Pens averaged 2.36 goals against. That’s pretty darn good. But. here’s the caveat. In that entire playoffs, they did not win 1 single game where they gave up more than 3 goals. Not one. That’s zero for those unsure still. And their record in those same playoffs was 2-3 when they gave up exactly 3 goals. So, that leaves 14 wins where they gave up less than 3 goals. That’s how you win playoff games. You want to discuss the following year? 15-3 when giving up 3G or less in the playoffs. In those 15 wins they gave up 3G 1 single time. 1-6 when giving up 4 or more. Winning 1 single game where they gave up more than 3 goals.
    Not one game against a bottom half team in scoring in the league this year where they yielded less than 3 goals. Is it just the defensemen? No. Of course not. It’s a team effort I’ll give you that. But, the differences are startling.
    OK, 1 more interesting stat. Its a far different game now, but in the Pens’ first 2 cup runs in the ’90’s, they had a total of 8 victories in the playoffs when they gave up more than 3 goals in a game. Even the high flying Oilers didn’t win that many games in any 2 year span of cup victories giving up more than 3G. (I hope that’s correct, I did it fast) And that second Penguin run was paused a bit by Scotty Bowman begging the boys to buckle down on defense after going down 3 games to 1 against Washington. It’s STILL all about defense.

  5. Matt Luda

    April 23, 2019 at 10:25 pm

    The fact remains, Letang was the primary reason why the Pens lost their last two playoff series. He turns 32 this week and will get worse before he gets better. Trade him, his $7-mil salary and bloated attitude as soon as possible if not earlier.

Make your voice heard

%d bloggers like this:

Join PHN Extra!

Join PHN+ today for exclusive content from Dan and Shelly plus a completely Google ad-free experience.


Or enter your email below to sign-up for our mailing list.

Thank you!

Something went wrong.

No thanks. I don't want.

Send this to a friend