Is Trading Down to Get Extra Draft Picks Worth It?

Pittsburgh Penguins, Team Canada, Daniel Sprong
PITTSBURGH, PA - JANUARY 04: Daniel Sprong #41 of the Pittsburgh Penguins skates in the second period during the game against the Carolina Hurricanes at PPG PAINTS Arena on January 4, 2018 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Justin Berl/Icon Sportswire)

There has been much speculation — outside the organization, anyway — about whether the Pittsburgh Penguins will trade their first-round choice in the upcoming NHL Draft to acquire an additional selection or two a bit later in the process.

Or, for that matter, whether they should do that.

Frankly, there are compelling reasons to support either approach.

In part because the Penguins have had just three first-round choices — Owen Pickering (2022), Sam Poulin (2019) and Kasperi Kapanen (2014) — in the past 10 drafts, their developmental pipeline is all but devoid of high-caliber prospects.

Pickering, a defenseman, has shown real promise, but doesn’t figure to have a significant impact in the NHL in the immediate future.

Poulin, who probably has the most potential of any forward in the system, seems like he’ll secure steady employment with the parent club at some point, although he’s given little indication that he’ll become a true difference-maker at this level.

Given that the earlier a player is chosen, the better the chances should be of him becoming an NHL contributor, that’s a pretty good reason to hold onto the 14th selection in the first round

That’s the theory, anyway.

Then again, there is a dearth of players on the Penguins’ organizational depth chart who are virtual locks to crack the NHL lineup anytime soon. If ever.

That’s why swapping the No. 1 for additional picks later in the draft would make sense; identifying teenagers who will develop into effective NHLers is far from a precise science, and the more choices a team has, the greater the chances should be that some will reach the league eventually.

For what it’s worth, Kyle Dubas, the Penguins’ president of hockey operations and interim GM, was not shy about trading down in the draft order during his run as GM in Toronto.

Of course, this will be the first draft he has overseen in his current role and the quality and quantity of legitimate NHL prospects available varies from year to year, so it wouldn’t be prudent to put undue emphasis on how the Penguins have fared in the past.

Still, it’s noteworthy that they have had a total of 17 second-round selections and 17 third-rounders over the past 20 years, and the players chosen later actually have been more productive as pros.

Eleven of the Nos. 2 made it to the NHL — one of them, Carl Sneep, played just one game at this level — while 12 of those selected in Round 3 have.

More importantly, the third-rounders have had much more staying power and greater impact than the others.

Two second-round forwards who no longer are with the Pittsburgh Penguins, Teddy Blueger (Vegas) and Daniel Sprong (Seattle), have appeared in 268 NHL games, tying for the most of any among the 17.

No fewer than eight of the 17 players the Penguins claimed in Round 3 over the past two decades have surpassed that total.

They are Alex Goligoski (1,042), Kris Letang (1,005), Robert Bortuzzo (533), Bryan Rust (505), Jake Guentzel (453), Daniel Carcillo (429), Oskar Sundqvist (355) and Matt Murray (272).

Of course, it doesn’t matter in 2023 how the Penguins drafted under Craig Patrick, Ray Shero, Jim Rutherford or Ron Hextall, or that Nos. 2 like Johannes Salmonsson and Keven Veilleux, among others, never lived up to the expectations of the people who selected them.

But the hit-and-miss nature of how the Pittsburgh Penguins’ second-round selections during the past 20 years have worked out might provide a cautionary tale for Dubas as he contemplates his options leading up to the draft.

Tags:

Categorized:

0What do you think?Post a comment.
9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Uros
Uros
2 years ago

Anything that helps us clean house is good. If there is an advantage in doing that by trading down, it’s a no brainer. That is our priority. The future will come, just not now. It takes time to build, but we need our team to be good for the next couple of years and that’s not possible in this setup. And we all know how “doing both things” works. If this mess gets cleaned, I’ll be interested in next year”s draft and decisions that come with it.

RJ
RJ
2 years ago

See if the Sharks would trade picks #26 & #36 for pick #14 and Granlund.

Rob
Rob
2 years ago
Reply to  RJ

Sounds like a good fantasy anyway..

Jason Conrad
Jason Conrad
2 years ago

The pens can find value in trading down or better yet trading for a role player or a player that can play now and not in 3-4 years it will be full rebuild then anyway. Go out in a blaze of glory and hope you get lucky with the lottery!

Pittsburgh fan 4 life
Pittsburgh fan 4 life
2 years ago

Trade down and see if can include some of hextalls dead weight that sunk the Pens, like Grunland….. only keep the youngsters like Smith and the other kids

Rob
Rob
2 years ago

Hope this trade,free agent and draft is a lot more productive than this past March with players mentioned. Gotta be better than in March.

Rob
Rob
2 years ago

Dangle Rust as trade bait unless he’s another one with a No trade clause or at least a list of teams he’d go to which is what’s holding up change to this team with the family friendly atmosphere.

Jeff Young
Jeff Young
2 years ago
Reply to  Rob

I think Rust’s is a full NMC…?

Vince Gori
Vince Gori
2 years ago

Too bad we didn’t have the assets to trade up. The next generational Sidneyesque talent would come in handy. We need a run on quality picks like Fleury, Crosby, Malkin, and Stahl. Shame is how bad the early millennium teams had to be to garner those picks. I don’t want to go there ever again.