Opinion
Kingerski: It’s Time to Change Penguins Goalies, It’s Time for Blomqvist
Tristan Jarry is a talented goaltender who was mentioned as a candidate for Team Canada in the 2026 Winter Olympics as recently as last year. Alex Nedeljkovic is a scrappy battler on a two-year contract who has revived his career. Yet neither has compiled enough good games this season to stabilize the goaltending position for the Pittsburgh Penguins.
Both Penguins goalies have teetered around an .890 save percentage for the bulk of the campaign, which is well below average. After another rough weekend, Jarry is at .888, and Nedeljkovic is at .886. While the greater failure rests upon Jarry, who is supposed to be the No. 1 goalie and carries a $5.375 million salary cap hit for three seasons after this, the unavoidable truth is that the team hasn’t gotten consistent goaltending from the tandem.
The Penguins rank 30th in save percentage. Only the goalie-starved Columbus Blue Jackets (.884) and Philadelphia Flyers (.879) are lower.
Feelings and egos be damned, it’s just about time to call up Joel Blomqvist from the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins and begin his NHL career in earnest.
The first question is who should pair with Blomqvist.
Nedeljkovic has somewhat outplayed Jarry recently, though not significantly, and has generally avoided soft goals but was literally on the bottom of the pile Saturday against the Ottawa Senators, who scored five goals (As noted in the Penguins report card, we’re still dubious about two or three of them, but the NHL counted five).
When the Penguins have good goaltending, they’ve beaten very good teams, such as the Edmonton Oilers on Thursday. Nedeljkovic made 40 saves that night, including some acrobatic stops, and the team responded.
The team also seems to like playing for Nedeljkovic.
“On and off the ice the ice, everybody loves him. He’s a competitor,” said the equally scrappy Blake Lizotte. “He makes the saves he’s supposed to, and every once in a while makes those saves–he’s athletic. He’s a grinder and never quits on a play … We love him, and the confidence (in him) is fully there.”
That echoes coach Mike Sullivan’s comments near the end of last season when he tapped Nedeljkovic for the final 13 starts of the season during a furious playoff push.
The players are fighting for the 2024-25 season, and while general manager Kyle Dubas isn’t shopping for short-term roster help, a change to the goaltending structure seems increasingly necessary. The Penguins’ season has been stuck in a sideways trajectory in which success is proceeded by failure, and those failures are mitigated by just enough success to embrace optimism before inviting more failure.
It’s a vicious cycle leading to an 18-19-8 record.
Since the return to play following the holiday break, Jarry had been soft, and winnable contests became extra-time losses. For a team embroiled in a playoff battle with no less than a half-dozen teams, every point counts, and the Penguins kindly gift-wrapped a few and gave them away.
They lost 5-2 Sunday to the Tampa Bay Lightning, who registered just 18 shots. Jarry gave up three goals on 16 shots, one of which he should have stopped and another he could have stopped.
It’s a trend.
By no means should the entirety of the Penguins’ mediocre record or their consistent trading of wins and losses to a sub-.500 record be placed solely upon the goalies. In fact, goaltending is merely one of a handful of issues plaguing the team.
Sometimes, the netminding is fantastic, and sometimes, it’s a cause for great concern.
Since the Penguins’ future is front and center in nearly all personnel moves, it’s entirely in keeping with general manager Kyle Dubas’s plan to call up Blomqvist as soon as possible. This season, the Penguins goalie prospect has taken a tiny statistical step backward with a .912 save percentage (compared to .921 last season. However, we should note that injuries have battered the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins defense, and they weren’t the most defensive-minded group anyway.
Blomqvist acquitted himself well when he got his first NHL shot earlier this season as Jarry was relegated to the AHL on a conditioning assignment to regain form.
Blomqvist had a shaky game or two during his NHL stint and was 3-5-0 in the NHL with a .904 save percentage behind a team that was also shaky. That save percentage now stands 16 points better than either current Penguins goalie.
The biggest question seems to be not when Blomqvist should be recalled but how to make space for him when they do: a Penguins trade or send one of the goalies through waivers to WBS?
Do they dare destroy Jarry’s trade value and perhaps confidence by giving him a ticket to WBS or simply shoving him in the press box as they carry three goalies?
A side note to the process is that the organization also has Sergei Murashov stashed in Wheeling of the ECHL. The rapidly rising prospect recently lost his first start in a couple of months. Dominant would be a proper adjective to describe his play, which should earn him a promotion to the AHL, but it has not yet been forthcoming because the Penguins depth chart is logjammed.
It would seem now is the time to loosen the logjam.
Sullivan has never treated Jarry as if he was truly the number one goalie. Jarry in my opinion needs to play 4-5 games in a row. Putting him in for a game every 3 games does not allow Jarry to get into a rhythm/zone. Sullivan has always given the backup goalie better than he does the supposed Number 1, ask Fluery.
What?!
Bob S is Tristan Jarry !!! Haha ! Pragmatic solution: Trade Ned for a pick, run Blomqvist/Jarry for the duration of the season, riding the hot-hand/goalie per particular opponent. In all likelihood the remaining Retained Salary slot will be for MP, to gain a first round pick or equivalent. In the offseason all 3 Retained Salary slots open up (this is not a Buy-Out) and could be used to facilitate a Jarry trade, probable retention is 30%, approx. 1.6 mil for 3 years. In the summer, with the rising cap, teams will be more inclined to take on Jarry @… Read more »
True… Just recently, loss to Florida after giving up 2 goals last week, he sits. No other team treats their supposed starter this way.
But it’s not only a back up thing, Sullivan was extremely stubborn to turn to Jarry over Murray after Murray lost it.
Bob, better take up a new sport your hockey IQ is very, very low.
He gives up a goal on the first or second shot nearly every game. He’s unplayable!
I agree 100% Dan….bring up Blomqvist and trade either Ned or Jarry or send one down to WBS….its time to try SOMETHING with the goalie room and the future is Blomqvist and even Larsson to some extent. Doing NOTHING is getting on everyone’s nerve. Murashov is a year or so away.
I hear that Duby has tried to move Jarry for a while but can’t find a suitable taker. Need him to enhance his trade value, not destroy it.
Eat half his contract and try to get rid of him.
Wait till the off-season, they’ll eat a portion for 3 years, but not half. The return will unfortunately be underwhelming.
I have been on Jarry’s “support side” for a while now, thinking he could/would regain his form. Unfortunately for all involved, team and fans, the time has come to cut bait. Not truly knowing any of these guys, from the optics and such, I think Ned would be a better teammate/backup, support guy for Blomqvist than Jarry. It’s time for KD to find a buyer, retain some salary if necessary, or deal one of the draft picks we’ve picked up, and move on. Unless there’s a team with an underperforming #2 center with a comparable contract that might need a… Read more »
I’ve supported Jarry, too. I keep waiting for him to regain his All-Star form, and I still wouldn’t bet against him doing it. But he’s been consistently inconsistent for a calendar year now and goaltender is easily the organization’s strength in terms of prospects. Plus, he is still in his prime and could turn it around with a fresh start. Probably best to move Jarry for the best return possible and turn the page—for both sides.
Interesting question is whether Blomqvist is the long-term guy in goal or not.
Time to acknowledge that the “Mob” got this one right – No?
It’s time to make the Gibson-Zegras for Jarry-Pettersson-salary compensation trade with possibly another piece or two in the mix. No doubt that goaltending has contributed mightily to the pathetic goals-against average. Per Money Puck, Neddy and Jarry rank 43rd the 44th in Expected Goals Saved (minimum: 15 games played). Gibson is No. 9.
I don’t think bringing a goalie back makes sense as it does nothing to change the organizational issue. Fact is that Murashov needs to be in the AHL. So if Jarry or Ned get traded, getting a goalie (let alone one under contract until 2027) makes little organizational sense (no matter how much of an upgrade Gibson would be right now).
Teams don’t lean on two young goalies who may or may not be NHL caliber. Most prefer two with NHL experience and one prospect who has upside. Gibson-Neddy-Blomqvist would give this team a chance to win now and later.
The trade is focused on getting rid of Jarry vs making the team better. We need a young 2C and 3C and maybe 2 RDs. Plus we need to move players that may have some value and use cap to do it where we can. We can only retain on 1 player, bute we can take back another player with cap. Agreed need to move Petersson – maybe bundle a 3rd and get a top prospect or a 2026 1st (2026 is a deeper draft) We need to move Karlsson – maybe retain $4m, throw in a 3rd round pick,… Read more »
I see Pettersson going to a contender. Also, what is in this trade for the Ducks? Maybe they could flip Pettersson to a contender, but then they are stuck with Jarry as a backup when Dostal is their starter.
Dostal is ready to be a starter right now. And the Ducks could do worse than Jarry as a back-up. If he plays well, they could trade him to a contender at some point. They’re also in the market for a veteran d-man, a void that Pettersson (who the Ducks once drafted in the second round) would fill nicely.
Do you really think that any team wants a $5.3 mil backup goaltender? Get real.
After a goalie trade, the call up should be Larsson. Unfortunately this is not a winning environment to develop a young player. Nor is this team a save or 2 away from winning.
Larsson is somewhat forgotten, but he does have even better numbers right now than Blomqvist. I would agree with this move and then WB/S can alternate starts between their top prospect goaltenders.
I’ve scouted Larsson a couple of times, and in training camp. He has good numbers, but the visual differentiation between he and JB is significant enough to note.
The argument for Larsson over Blomqvist is more about protecting a prospect from getting shelled every night in Pittsburgh and losing vs playing on a winning team and gaining more confidence in the minors. I could go either way, honestly.
YES YES YES….I guess I’m part of the MOB but what kills me is the pay difference between Jarry and Ned. It’s so obvious this team plays better when Neddy’s in net. Don’t get me wrong though, both of them are good backups and definitely not starters.
Jarry stats and play lately has been better than Ned’s. Not sure what games you’re watching, but battling Ned sucks
He wouldn’t be battling Ned if Jarry didn’t choke in big games and don’t forget who’s being paid to be a backup ands who’s getting starter goalie pay. Ned didn’t have to go to the AHL to get his $hit together. You really think the players feel more comfortable when Jarrys in net….really???
Question: last year we were reading about the great work Andy Chiodo was doing with the goalies. How’s that looking now? Is he spending all his time in PGH or also scurrying around to help with the guys in the pipeline?
With the significant holes in this team, bringing Blomqvist up now could do more damage than good. The narratives on goaltending always seem to minimize the bigger flaws in this team. Shesterkin’s numbers through 1/2 of this year are very close to Jarry and Ned’s numbers for last year and substantially below his numbers in the past few years. Why? The team in front of him has serious problems. I am all for moving both Jarry and Ned, but addressing the other problems with this team that are far more important. The Pens had the 32nd-ranked defense for most of… Read more »
Pens “depth chart is log jammed”…… with crappy goalies. Dubas strikes again with a terrible contract for Jarry.
While it is time for a goaltending change (honestly ship them both out at this point)… THIS TEAM IS THE WORST DEFENSIVE TEAM IN HOCKEY. Certainly not a team that will help to develop Blomqvist or Larsson. Why destroy the young guys’ confidence just as Jarry’s (and Ned’s) have been destroyed?
That is a very valid point. However, look at it as a way to give all the players who are playing well a promotion. All of their goaltenders in the minors have earned a bump up to the next level. That includes Murashov, who is basically owning the ECHL, but is banished there until a spot in the Ahl opens up.
I agree. Bring him up when you bring in 2 good defensemen.
How about that quote from Lizotte ?!….if that isn’t telling, I don’t know what is
Do nothing Dubas will just let it ride.
Dubas needs to just accept he made a mistake signing Jarry. We all make mistakes but he needs to go. Bring up Blomqvist and try and get a restart. I don’t think that Jarry was ever a good teammate!
A change is needed for sure. Problem is someone would want one of our goalies.
No one wants Jarry right now. Someone might actually want Ted and even if it’s a 7th rounder they should do it to get the other guys in the org moved up.
JB should be called up now. This gives the team more time to evaluate him while murashov continues progressing in the ahl. I don’t know if placing Jarry on waivers is an option(not sure why it wouldn’t be?)but that’s what I would do. He’s never regaining any trade value and at 29 he pretty much is what he is at this point. Best case is some goalie desperate team picks him up . At worst he goes to the minors
So everyone in Pittsburgh says “Jarry is terrible and needs to go!” If he’s that bad, what GM is going to trade for him without getting something significant added to the deal or if the Pens take on someone else’s problem contract. Unless he starts playing at an unbelievable level, will he ever have any trade value? So why worry about crushing his trade value by sending him to WBS. If they waive him and he gets claimed, that would be better than paying someone to take him. If he doesn’t get claimed, I think they need to use a… Read more »
As I have said, Edmonton always seems hard up for goaltending. I’d see if they’d give a 2026 first or second for Jarry at 2.7 or 1.35 million for this year and next year. Call St. Louis ask them to eat some Jarry salary and take back their second round pick from 2026 and give the Pens their first in 2026 and Saad. St. Louis basically gets of Saad’s salary at the cost of eating some of Jarry’s salary and dropping down like 20-25 picks. Pens in essence gets Saad, two 2026 first round picks for Jarry and a second… Read more »
Gets rid of Saad’s salary is what I am saying above
I am not sure that in any world Jarry would be worth a 1st rnd pick. Definitely not 2 of them. Why wouldn’t Edmonton just stick with Skinner, who has slightly better numbers and got them to the finals last season?
Skinner is awfully shaky. For Edmonton, I think the hope would be a 50/50 arrangement would return Jarry to all star form. It would be just a 1.35 million bet for two seasons. I see Jarry as a 1B or backup goalie like Ned.
Jarry is even more shaky than Skinner at this point, though, also unproven in the playoffs. There is the hope that Jarry returns to all star form and the fact that he is from that area so he would be going home and that would be great for him. I just don’t think that a team with real Stanley Cup aspirations would gamble and trade for “the hope” of getting the All-Star Jarry. At the very least, Jarry should be way down on the list for the Oilers after all possible other options have been explored.
To be consistent , Dan.. if .921 to .912 is considered ‘TINY’ step back of 0.09 sv pct for Blomqvist.
Then Jarrys .895 since 11/19 compared to league average of .901 should be considered ‘below average by a ‘TINY’ bit of 0.06 sv pct.
So Jarry, who is not having a great season, is just below league average, in spite of playing for a defensively challenged average team, and in spite of being disrupted of getting settled with consecutive starts.
And if you look at when the penguins were bunching wins, it was when they were giving Jarry consecutive starts.
The difference is–921 to 912 are numbers that are both good. 895 to 888 is bad to worse.
The point is .09 is ‘tiny’ when you want it to be, and its ‘well-below’ when you want it to be.
League average save percentage is .901
Jarry since 11/19 is .895… .06 is ‘tiny’ or ‘well below’?
This is about your choice of adjective…
obviously, we can’t compare AHL numbers to NHL numbers. Or else Jarrys .926 or Larssons .927 would change the course of your opinion piece.
I agree T A. That is semantics. Also, when you look at Shots against, Pittsburgh it close to top of league in shots against. Noting that they tend to give up Higher quality chances. The extra shots turn into goals more frequently. The goalie is the easiest position to blame for a weak defensive team. Malkin, Letang, Karlsson, even Sid struggle defensively. Sidney is over a point a game and is a minus 14. Zac Werenski of the blue jackets has as many points and is a +8, on an equally bad team. There is no defense on this team.… Read more »
This is what happens as a gm when you go into free agency to fill a position of need. You are always going to overpay. The real culprit is Hextall, who let Jarry get to free agency(rather than signing a less expensive extension in season) where he would be the best goaltender available, and the price would go sky high. At the time, the penguins did not have these goaltending prospects, and Dubas had to pick up a free agent or have no goaltender. So, for as much as people want to be mad at Dubas, what he did in… Read more »
The 🐧s’ should just waive Jarry & get it over with….
Waiving him wouldn’t do anything but free up a tiny bit of cap space and take away playing time from someone in the minors. The team is going to have to find a way to remove one of the goaltenders from the nhl roster permanently. Doubt that any team would claim him. Puljujarvi cleared and he actually has something to offer an nhl roster and has a low cap hit. I mean, it’s worth a try, but doubtful that it would even change anything. The teams that actually need a goaltender now wouldn’t have free cap space to claim him… Read more »
Goaltending is not the problem, it is team defense. Yes both guys have given up a goal on the first shot in multiple games. Why though? Because the defense is standing watching the other team get a grade A chance. Letang and Karlsson are defensive train wrecks. You can put any top goalie in net and they will give up plenty of goals and then get injured having to make save after save. You can’t expect the goalie to make 10-15, highlight saves a game. I have watched every game and yes the goalies have let a soft one in… Read more »