Penguins Lack of Interest in Shattenkirk Highlights Boxed-In Defense, Philosophy | Pittsburgh Hockey Now
Connect with us

Penguins Offseason Analysis

Penguins Lack of Interest in Shattenkirk Highlights Boxed-In Defense, Philosophy

Published

on

Jack Johnson Pittsburgh Penguins Trade Rumors

The chance to add a 40-point defenseman should have been an attractive prospect to the Pittsburgh Penguins. Defenseman Kevin Shattenkirk signed a hefty four-year, $26.6 million contract with the New York Rangers just two years ago but things did not work out. He was available this week on the cheap. The Penguins could not entertain the idea because they are boxed in with their current blueline corps. And the salary cap. And therein lies their problems.

In full disclosure, a source immediately dismissed the Penguins interest as soon as Shattenkirk became available. Even if they had money, some in the Penguins organization were not enamored with the defenseman.

Shattenkirk, 30, was a perennial 40-point rearguard until he arrived in New York. The Rangers were rebuilding, and Shattenkirk wasn’t paired with a dynamic roster. Compounding matters in New York, the Rangers were marshmallow soft. Their TV announcers called them out. The New York brand of paddy-cake emboldened opponents which exacerbated Shattenkirk’s sometimes delicate game.

Last season, Shattenkirk scored only 28 points (2g, 26a) in 73 games and New York bought out the defenseman as the team hit a cap crunch. Sunday, Shattenkirk signed with powerhouse Tampa Bay for only $1.75 million, and the Pittsburgh Penguins missed another opportunity.

The Penguins really couldn’t offer Shattenkirk; not while they sit over the salary cap and still have sign RFA defenseman Marcus Pettersson. Even if they had a few bucks in the till, the Penguins are trapped with their current array of defenders. Each defensive pairing is carefully balanced for itself and the team. Remove one piece, and their Jenga tower would tumble. Slide Jack Johnson to the third pairing, and suddenly the Penguins wouldn’t have any puck skills on the pair. Move Marcus Pettersson to the second pairing with Justin Schultz, and suddenly they have a dangerously soft second pair.

Make one move, and the Jenga tower tumbles.

RedBeard's Pittsburgh

And so, Tampa Bay, which was so far in front of the field last season they lost sight of the pack in their rearview mirror by January, picked up a talented player on the rebound.

With former GM Steve Yzerman and current boss Julien BriseBois, it seems Tampa Bay has a pretty good track record with player acquisitions over the past several years. Tampa Bay also has unsigned restricted free agents Brayden Point and Adam Erne. Point reportedly declined Montreal’s offer for a big-time offer sheet in July, which Montreal then offered to Carolina RFA Sebastien Aho.

Call it a bad comparison if you will, but if Tampa Bay was interested, why weren’t the Penguins?

Shattenkirk’s availability and the Penguins inability, refusal, and disinterest highlights the Penguins trap and their current thinking. They have denied wanting to get bigger and tougher, but their actions speak otherwise. Jack Johnson and Brandon Tanev are their most recent UFA acquisitions. Nick Bjugstad was acquired in February. He is a towering center who plays a strong game, though not overly physical. The Penguins final trade deadline acquisition was hard-knuckled defenseman Erik Gudbranson.

Shattenkirk is not a tough defender. The Penguins glut of third-pairing guys, perhaps including both current second pairing defenseman Johnson and Schultz is part of the Penguins issue.

Penguins GM Jim Rutherford called his defense, “good enough.” He also admitted his defense is “not the best in the league.”

So, with Pettersson unsigned, the Penguins over the cap, and a lack of offense on their blue line, the Penguins made it a hard pass on Shattenkirk. And that just seems to highlight their situation: the good (enough), the bad and the costly.

Subscribe to PHN+

Pittsburgh Hockey Now owner, formerly 93.7 The Fan, Sportsnet Hockey Tonight. Catch Dan tweeting @theDanKingerski and the official @pghhockeynow account.

8 Comments

8 Comments

  1. David Gomes

    August 6, 2019 at 11:47 am

    Please. I wouldn’t take him for free. Nothing but a PP specialist.

  2. Social Source

    August 6, 2019 at 12:08 pm

    Maybe the reason why they weren’t interested is because Shattenkirk is over-rated. Or did you forget when “Dad”, Matt Cullen, 40 years old undressed him for this shorthanded goal – https://www.nhl.com/penguins/video/cullens-shorthanded-tally/t-277437428/c-51763803

    • Dan Kingerski

      August 6, 2019 at 12:46 pm

      I think you misunderstood the piece.

  3. Pingback: Penguins Lack of Interest in Shattenkirk Highlights Boxed-In Defense, Philosophy - Pittsburgh Hockey Now -

  4. Edgar

    August 6, 2019 at 4:49 pm

    Count me among those who wish we could have taken a shot at him at less than $2M for 1 year. Maybe we sign him and trade Schultz. Who knows, but I agree wholeheartedly when you rid yourself of options, you box yourself in a corner. And that’s a deathtrap. And we did it for marginal talent. That’s the real problem. Which, when you think about it, is a real shame because we have Crosby and Malkin on money saving deals. Is it out of the realm to say they combined have signed for $5M less per year? I know teams who win multiple cups have to retool, just the nature of the beast, but I think we did a poor job.
    What the hell, I’ll continue. When JR made the deal with Fla. I was unhappy with guys had term. Everyone (on the other site) was overjoyed, but with that term comes less flexibility.I’m not sold on either guy as of yet. Not that I dislike them individually. But we have seen you need guys playing at the top of their game to win the cup. We were fortunate with the input we got from Rust, Hags, Kuni, and Cullen. I’m not sure these guys can match that moving forward. (Full disclosure I thought Hags was the MVP of the first cup run if you think about his performance in the playoffs vs. his normal output)

  5. Herman

    August 6, 2019 at 5:13 pm

    I know Pittsburgh is not the type of team to eat contract or pull a Redden but if I was Pens GM I would have definitely done what was suggested above and move Schultz. Perhaps traded for Ristolainen; signed Shattenkirk short term and either trade Gudbranson or put him through waivers to facilitate defensive group.

    Pettersson – Ristolainen
    JJ/ Riikola – Shattenkirk

  6. James

    August 6, 2019 at 8:44 pm

    Terrible column, it was the capitals big trade several years ago to put them over the penguins in the playoffs. That trade failed miserably, why would the penguins want him now. That guy’s washed up. He was traded years ago at his highest value. Obviously this is just written to bring together the people who hate jack Johnson. Shattenkirk stinks.

    • Dan Kingerski

      August 7, 2019 at 6:24 am

      It appears you too missed the main points of the story. Also, if you’re accusing me of inciting hate on Jack Johnson, you must be new around here. This site is the level, informative and insightful outlet. Welcome.

Make your voice heard

%d bloggers like this:

Join PHN Extra!

Join PHN+ today for exclusive content from Dan and Shelly plus a completely Google ad-free experience.

PHN+

Or enter your email below to sign-up for our mailing list.

Thank you!

Something went wrong.

No thanks. I don't want.

Send this to a friend