Connect with us

Opinion

Kingerski: Move Evgeni Malkin to Wing; Use Rare Free Agent Class

Published

on

Pittsburgh Penguins, Evgeni Malkin celebrates

On the list of the Pittsburgh Penguins’ priorities, it has not been stated and may not even appear.

Move Evgeni Malkin from center to the left wing. It’s been written and said before in this space, but it should now be a very serious consideration and near the top of the priority list for all involved. The Penguins should investigate a significant structural change and take full advantage of the rare bumper crop of free-agent centers to facilitate their makeover for next season.

There might not be a better time than July 1, 2024, to snag a legitimate center capable of second-line duties behind Sidney Crosby. And possibly transition to life beyond Crosby.

The free agent class of centers is unlike any in years.

Mario Lemieux moved to the wing in his final seasons to maximize his effectiveness and to lessen the physical effects of the 82-game NHL grind. Pirates cornerstone Andrew McCutchen begrudgingly moved out of center field.

After watching Malkin fight through this season, it seems unmistakable that such a move could rejuvenate the powerful forward who was forced to admit he can’t fly around the ice like he used to. Who knows, he might want to play more than two more years?

Malkin had 67 points (27-40-67) but the lowest points-per-game in his career (.82).

The same switch worked wonders for Claude Giroux at 30 years old.

Giroux, 36, is having a great second act in the later stages of his career. Over the past two seasons, he scored 56 goals and 143 points. When the move happened in 2017-18, Giroux posted a career year with 102 points (34-68-102).

Age happens. Accepting the reality could go a long way to setting the Penguins up for success beyond the coming season. Such a move could even lessen the burden on Crosby, who remarkably has not yet had shoulder surgery despite carrying an entire team for six months.

With Reilly Smith’s down year, if not poor fit with the Penguins, and trading Jake Guentzel, the team needs a top-six LW capable of more than 20 goals. Perhaps it’s Drew O’Connor’s time. There is no knocking his value or potential, but he had only 16 goals this season.

Is there any doubt Malkin could fill the scoring-winger role with aplomb?

Malkin will be 38 by next season and he’s indicated the two years remaining on his contract will be his last. As he comically bellowed on the first day of training camp this season, “Three more years!”

Well, now there are two left, and a similar treasure trove of available centers is unlikely to emerge in the near future.

Even if Malkin’s move doesn’t happen immediately, having the arrow in the quiver would be a perfect transitional move. What are the odds that Crosby and Malkin play a full 82-game schedule for the third consecutive year? They couldn’t do that in their prime, and it seems a lot to ask now. A significant injury to either one could very quickly derail a season, pushing the Penguins into a high lottery pick instead of a playoff position.

And make no mistake, earning a berth in the Stanley Cup playoffs next season is the goal, not a top-five pick.

Penguins Salary Cap/Available UFAs

With Jeff Carter’s retirement and Michael Bunting’s lower salary compared to Guentzel, the Penguins figure to have at least $10 million in cap space on July 1. That’s not counting any trades that may add or subtract the stack of chips on Penguins president of hockey operations/GM Kyle Dubas’s poker table.

Pending a couple of restricted-free agent contracts, the Penguins could have as much as $12 million to spend against the coming $87.7 million salary cap.

C’mon, with that kind of cap numerology, it has to be Sidney Crosby’s year, right? But I digress.

The Penguins are projected to be around 75-$77 million, including the penultimate year of Jack Johnson’s buyout and the final year of Jeff Petry’s salary retention.

It’s a great problem: How to spend eight figures when much of the roster is already set? As much as you’ll miss Jansen Harkins and Emil Bemstrom, there are always plenty of bargain pluggers available for bottom-six duty. Perhaps a shutdown defensive forward and one with some offensive pop would help.

For the sake of argument, let’s posit the Penguins will have $10 million to fill that top-six scoring need, perhaps a center.

Of course, between now and July 1, a few names may come off the board as teams lock up their pending UFAs. But a few will be available who will meet critical Penguins criteria: good skater, defensively responsible, offensively creative, and younger than 35.

With the Penguins’ cash situation, they can shoot for the stars.

The current pending list of UFA centers, some of whom have flipped to the wings but could flip back, includes names such as Sam Reinhart, Elias Lindholm, Matt Duchene, Chandler Stephenson, and RFA (with arbitration rights) Casey Mittelstadt, who had a good bump after being traded to Colorado.

Stephenson is the best of the bunch defensively and is a solid 50-55 point scorer. Sam Reinhart had a monster year with Florida, registering 94 while scoring 57 goals. He won’t be cheap.

You could forgive coach Mike Sullivan if he drooled at the potential of Crosby-Stephenson-Eller down the middle. The Penguins would lose far fewer leads, guaranteed.

But therein lies the Penguins’ great potential on July 1. They’ll have money to spend, and even more if they can move ill-fitting veterans.

It could be a transformative summer, with or without moving Malkin to the wing, but they won’t get a better chance to sign adequate replacements. If you’re curious, the 2025 UFA class is currently headlined by Crosby, John Tavares, Nick Backstrom, Ryan Johansen, and Evgeny Kuznetsov.

We’ll assume Leon Draisaitl and Crosby will re-sign or that Draisaitl will be prohibitively expensive.

That’s the opposite of a bumper crop of free agents.

And that makes this summer their big chance.

20 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bryant bechtol
Bryant bechtol
9 days ago

First I like the fire Sullivan move then move malkin to wing then move jarry to another team and last Karlsson for 2 defenseman that will play defence

howardlauderback
howardlauderback
8 days ago
Reply to  Bryant bechtol

You got it exactly right, all no brainer moves. Start with a new coach or the rest won’t matter.

Zane Gearhart
Zane Gearhart
9 days ago

I like: Sid , Geno, Stephenson, Eller down the middle to start. I don’t disagree with moving geno to the wing, but a 2nd option to help conserve energy would be having the ability to actually run 4 lines consistently. That would also help Geno with his age and a long regular season. As Dan said even if you don’t move him to the wing immediately you can always have an option to adjust later on.

John
John
9 days ago
Reply to  Zane Gearhart

We need to let Poulin, who I don’t think has the skating ability to play consistently in the NHL, and the AHL center they got in the Guentzel trade, to battle it out for 4C. Need one to step up so they can play 3C the following year when Ellet’s contract is up.

wesman33
wesman33
8 days ago
Reply to  Zane Gearhart

Zane your comment makes the most sense of all. If this team wants to turn things around they need to stop trying to win with two lines . Sure everyone loves Eller but he’s a third or probably a really good forth line forward. When Sully flopped the Eller and Malkin line they needed a better center than Eller for that

Last edited 8 days ago by wesman33
Brian X
Brian X
9 days ago

Yes, and someone like Sam Reinhart could wake up the power play.

John
John
9 days ago

Extremely interesting article. Dan, what about Malkin’s lack of quick first step? Wing requires posting on the boards, and distributing, then filling in behind. Quickness is important. Malkin is not quick.

On the flip side, he wouldn’t have the down low responsibilities of C. So less skating and banging = less toll on the old body.

Eric
Eric
9 days ago
Reply to  John

Also, will moving him to the wing improve his motovation desire, and improve his defensive acumen? I don’t believe so. Although his numbers were respectable this year, when he was bad, he was really bad! And his lack of energy and effort really permeates with his teammates.

Eric
Eric
9 days ago

Dan, understand the logic, however moving Geno to wing will not guarantee motivation, effort, and defensive responsibilites. Unless you know something I don’t.

Eri
Eri
8 days ago
Reply to  Dan Kingerski

Personally don’t think it’s his heart/effort, but a lapse in judgment/decision making. I think the Wing move is a good idea, and should limit that burden to a degree. Also gives Sullivan options when/if lines are juggled. Dubas would need to clearly and tactfully deliver the message to Malkin – I think he’s a team player like Letang and will adapt if he’s not blindsided. A middle-ish 20’s Center for now and future makes so much sense in the Win Now/Plan for the Future directive. I imagine Lindholm & Reinhardt are looking @ 9 mil by 6/7 years? Is that… Read more »

Eri
Eri
8 days ago
Reply to  Eric

I wouldn’t question his effort, with an 82 game season every player around the NHL, 87 excluded, cannot be motivated every shift, of every period, of every game – but I’d say he’s motivated most nights. His defensive acumen is questionable, but either wing has the least amount of defensive responsibility of any on ice position. They’d have to be up front and let him know this is what the team needs and he’d need to get used to the idea prior to camp. At the least it should get him to shoot the puck more and become I’M SCORE… Read more »

KenNJ
KenNJ
8 days ago

Bravo Dan, Bravo.

Keith Thomas
Keith Thomas
8 days ago

Good article, Dan. I have thought that 71 was better off at wing for a long time. If my memory is correct, they tried Malkin at wing in time-past (pre-Sullivan), and it was a complete disaster. Malkin couldn’t adjust his game to the discipline of a winger and defensive coverage. I actually think it would be to his advantage to play wing, but it requires a LOT of discipline to play wing in all three zones. The bigger question is – would he be happy at wing or play for another team? It must be put to him as his… Read more »

Pete
Pete
8 days ago
Reply to  Keith Thomas

Keep Sully, keep losing

Adam Richmond
Adam Richmond
8 days ago
Reply to  Keith Thomas

Geno played wing with staal their rookie season and played well. But that was 18 years ago so…

Rick C
Rick C
8 days ago

I can’t agree with you here Dan. Finding and affording top 6 Centers is difficult to say the least. Trying to equate any of the UFAs capable of playing Center with Malkin, once you get past Duchene and Reinhardt is a joke. Even in terms of Pnts/60 minutes (PPG is not a fair assessment when one player gets more TOI) Malkin, Duchene and Reinhardt are equivalent (3.04 to 3.01 to 3.12 respectively). And in the case of Duchene and Reinhardt the question becomes will the Pens be able to compete in the bidding wars to get either of those players… Read more »

PenPal
PenPal
3 hours ago
Reply to  Dan Kingerski

Since we’re talking about moving Malkin to wing, the focus is 5v5: Stephenson has less points/60 (1.66 vs 2.19), worse GF% (48.61% vs 54.29%), worse xGF% (45.85% vs 52.18%) than Malkin. Using Dom Luszczyszyn’s model, Stephenson has +1 offensive rating & -3 defensive rating = -2 net rating and a market value of $2.5M. Compare to Malkin: +8 offensive & 0 defensive = +8 net & market value of $6.9M. This is a guy who played 2C on a better team with better wingers, yet managed to do worse than Malkin. I’m not seeing upgrade here. (Or why you believe… Read more »

Brett
Brett
8 days ago

Oconnor should have been on crosby’s line for the whole season. Fire Sullivan. Trade Malkin, Karlson, Graves,& Jarry…now u can fill in the holes with promotions, trades, or drafts. Those problems need to go and the team will be fine.