Penguins Repeat Brings Anger; Players, Sullivan Confront Blown Leads
It’s coach Mike Sullivan’s fault. It’s the DNA of the team that won’t play defense. It’s Kris Letang’s fault. And it’s Jeff Carter’s fault. The external noise surrounding the Pittsburgh Penguins’ opening night loss to the Chicago Blackhawks was replete with dismay and disbelief. Perhaps that should be expected for a team that coughed up 22 leads last season and began a new season in an old way.
According to MoreHockeyStats.com, the Penguins were the second-worst team in the NHL last season when they got a lead. Only the San Jose Sharks were worse, and only Vancouver choked away more multi-goal leads. For the record, the Penguins gave away eight two or more-goal leads, and Vancouver graciously gifted 10 wins to opponents when leading by a couple or more.
In the first few days of the new season, only two teams have fumbled away multi-goal leads: The Montreal Canadiens and …. the Penguins.
And while the blame game is easy, making sense of the result, which should only happen two or three times per season, is far more complex.
Eight blown multi-goal leads — that was last season. Thursday, Sullivan drew a stern line between the past and present.
“You guys continue to want to talk about last season. I really have no interest in talking about last season. This is a brand-new team. This is a whole new challenge. This is a whole group,” Sullivan said. “We’re going to try to we’re going to try to play the game a certain way that gives us the best chance to win. And I think to answer your question specifically, the best way to hang on to leads is to make sure you don’t beat yourself.”
Sullivan noted his team taking a careless stick penalty in the offensive zone just three minutes into the third period and the team’s poor puck management.
Complicating the external view is the dichotomy of the Penguins roster. They are both a vastly different team, as 10 of the 22 rostered players are new, and the same because the core leadership group and veterans remain.
The Pittsburgh Penguins Defensive System?
The growing belief among the participating Penguins fans via social media, comments, and talk shows is that Sullivan is stubborn. He won’t change the style of play, and thus, the Penguins are sitting ducks when they get a lead.
However, every human in the Penguins locker room and coaches’ room will say that changing the style of play is antiquated and not playing with the puck is a surefire way to get on your heels and give up leads.
“I don’t think we can let it creep in … We had problems with (that) last year, and obviously, the first night, we couldn’t capitalize on the lead that we had,” said Marcus Pettersson. “So I just think that we’ve got to play smarter; not sit back, but at the same time, play smart. We want to play our game. We don’t want to sit back and let them come out a million miles an hour all the time, either. But we don’t want to lose guys in the O-zone.
“So I think finding a balance there will be crucial for us.”
But why aren’t other teams gagging up leads like a toddler trying broccoli?
Was it Sullivan’s fault Ryan Donato beat Pettersson at the front of the net for the first goal?
Was it Sullivan’s fault that Drew O’Connor left Cole Guttman alone in the slot while gliding toward the net only a few feet away?
Was it Sullivan’s fault that no one tracked Jason Dickinson, a low-scoring fourth-line center, into the offensive zone on the game-winner?
The Penguins’ loss to Chicago was wide open. Like the final preseason game, a 7-4 win over Buffalo, the boys were figuring it out in a not-so-conservative manner. An equally salient question might be, how could the uber-talented Penguins lose a track meet to a lottery team?
Penguins Mindset?
Crosby didn’t note a needed change in mindset as much as their failure to get the next goal, whether to lead 3-0 or 3-1.
“You’ve just got to learn from it. I mean, it’s different things. It’s not always the same thing when you look at those (lost leads). If you’re looking at the last game, it’s getting that next goal to go up two and limiting mistakes,” said captain Sidney Crosby. “I mean, obviously, the fewer mistakes you make, the less chance of them getting Grade A’s and tying the game. So if teams are going to come back, we’ve got to make them earn it. I think that’s the way we like to look at it.”
In a rush to find a scapegoat or three, the external noise had picked its usual culprits, but perhaps there is one that is not being discussed that withstands scrutiny: mindset.
Why were so many fans and even the Canadian media already calling out the new team? Because even if there are a lot of new nameplates, the jerseys with the flightless bird have struggled to hold multi-goal leads.
“We have to get over the hump,” Bryan Rust conceded. “We need two or three times to play well (in that situation).”
The Penguins were a great team with the lead in 2021-22; only two teams were better, yet they were terrible in 2022-23. One mistake begot three. The cumulative effect of one loss became more losses, or at least uneasy victories.
“They’re going to push. You know, we hit the crossbar, they come back and end up scoring. So it’s a pretty fine line,” Crosby concluded.
It’s equally fair to ask why players with significant NHL experience, boxes of trophies, and Stanley Cup rings stray so far from winning hockey or why those players can’t stem the momentum by even the NHL’s weakest teams.
Is it a poor system? Hardly. The leads were also plentiful. While the 2023-24 Penguins don’t yet officially have a problem, a team that missed the playoffs by one win last season and figures to again be in a dogfight for a playoff spot in April has to carefully watch missed opportunities, even in October.
New Penguins
One thing that cannot connect the string of last season’s failures to the Tuesday collapse is the roster. A nearly 50% turnover should provide a clean slate. Rust, Pettersson, and Sullivan duly noted the fresh season.
Yet on Tuesday, Letang also noted the breakdowns, which eerily mirrored the past.
“I think it was a tight game the entire time because we let it happen like that. You saw (Chicago’s winning) goal is a fortunate bounce. It goes off our skate right to (Dickinson) like hanging out in the slot. Sometimes it looks like bad luck. But we always say that you create your own luck in hockey, so yeah, if we would have a step on the guys and play simply and just play a north-south game, I think we wouldn’t be in that situation as much as anything else.”
Sullivan left little doubt the question connecting last season to this was not his favorite. It shouldn’t be. The Pittsburgh Penguins 2023-24 are trying to move forward. Changes throughout the lineup have inserted vitality and optimism where disgust or disappointment previously resided.
Despite the pushback, don’t mistake that for ignoring the problem. Sullivan said the team went through video sessions Thursday morning before practice.
You can be sure the blown coverages and lethargic backchecking had starring roles.
“We have to become a team that doesn’t beat itself,” Sullivan said.
One game vs. fan fears of deja vu all over again. It’s an honest question, and the immediate past is still intricately part of the new Penguins story, even if the questions are somewhat annoying to those on the inside.
Of course, a few wins in that situation would fix any problems and erase most memories. However, it will take some time to get those wins because Friday is only the second game of the season.
Categorized:Penguins Penguins Analysis Penguins Locker Room
Time to sit Jarry.
Agreed
Jarry did fine
Jarry’s 5-on-5 Sv% was 0.897 and 11 of the 35 shots he faced were due to his own inability to control rebounds. Is that how you define fine?
Nobody cares about 5 on 5 save percentage. His actual save percentage was .914. That is going to win you most hockey games. It’s not his fault the Pengui ns botch coverages in front of the net or can only score 2 on Chicago.
You may not care about 5-on-5 Sv% but you count only as 1 person. The simple fact that the stat is tracked means many people count 5-on-5 Sv%. And Jarry does share in the fault of botched coverage in front of his net when he can’t control his rebounds to the tune of 11. Therefore, He may not be alone but Jarry is as seriously culpable for that humiliation as anyone else.
Impressed by how structured/disciplined the Canucks played in their season opener. Against the Oilers. With Tocchet as head coach. Connect the dots, girls and boys . . . #MissedOpp
You know what’s even more impressive about that Canucks win? They were upset that Edmonton embarrassed them in the FIRST GAME of LAST SEASON. Vancouver had a 3 nothing lead on Edmonton 39 seconds into the 2nd period. Edmonton scored 5 straight goals to win the game 5-3. Even though they played more games throughout the season, that first game stuck with them. They wanted to exact revenge on Edmonton for that loss. Funny that the Penguins didn’t show any of that same kind of passion against the team that knocked them out of the playoff last year, Chicago….or, was… Read more »
That’s a good way to look at it and it also makes it clear ? Where’s the fire that should be lit being that it was non-playoff teams that basically knocked them out however we really can’t ignore the roster turnover and that could actually have a lot to do with this comment being that a lot of the new players weren’t here to build a fire for this seasons revenge on team’s like Chicago however the Penguins should have beat this Blackhawks team and personally I think the NHL should be embarrassed for the way they called Bedards 1st… Read more »
I blame JJ. 😉
Stubborn is a kind word for it.
It is the system. Look how they chase the puck in the offense zone and miss. It is an easy breakout for the other team. We don’t need to trap but chasing late is a recipe for disaster. Hard headed Sullivan is the problem, and it won’t get better.
10 new players but 12 old ones and the same coach. How many blown leads and “we just have to learn from it” comments will we suffer this season? Only time will tell. But if MS is truly a good hockey coach he has got to fix it. 8 blown multi-goal leads this year should cost him the job. We have 1 game and 1 multi-goal lead blown. I hope they fix it soon. Lets Go Pens!
To say nothing of the fact that Jarry was completely outplayed yet once again by the opponents goalie. Did anyone see the ridiculous saves Peter M made? Holy cow! If we had reverse goalies the score would have been 22-0 in favor of the Pens. Call it what it is…Jarry blowing another lead.
And what’s up Jarry’s stupid pregame routine? He looks like he’s trying to get the stink out of his own net by wafting a fart with his left hand. It looks ridiculous and doesn’t help his game one bit. He should look at the stink squarely between his shoulders…MS needs to hold him to task as well.
That’s bright.
It definitely is the coaches fault. The personnel changes, the coaches stay the same, yet you get the same result.
Why does Sullivan believe in a goalie who everyone knows can’t stop anything on his glove side?
“One thing that cannot connect the string of last season’s failures to the Tuesday collapse is the roster.” One thing that wasn’t mentioned was the players age. The Pens might have. New roster, but they still have the oldest roster in the league. Is it possible that fatigue plays a factor late in games that could be part of the problem?
It shouldn’t in game 1, but the thought is interesting.
Interesting thing about the teams age, not only was the opening night lineup older than last season’s opening night lineup but last season the WBS Penguins were the 2nd youngest team in the AHL, going into today, because all of the veterans shipped down to WBS, displacing true prospects to Wheeling, the WBS Penguins jumped to 5th oldest; from 2nd youngest to 5th oldest, now that is a feat.
Different Team? This is not a new team, it is the same team as last season, as Joe Friday said on Dragnet, “only the names have changed”. Last season’s opening lineup was 30.0 years old. This season’s opening night line up was 30.9 years old. Nothing has changed. All the preseason chatter was smoke and mirrors to obfuscate the status quo. Changing the defensive system won’t fix things? First of all, alcoholics don’t admit they are alcoholics, criminals all say they are innocent, so I don’t care what the players and people inside the organization are saying. Basic sport science,… Read more »
The Pens have 3 problems they have to fix and time will on fix one of them. 1. We do have almost 50% new players and out side of the first line the rest of the team played with no chemistry. This will change. 2. Karlsson is not being used properly. That is a big concern on power plays. Too many egos. This will not change. This is a Sully blind spot. 3. No matter what Dan thinks. Most other teams and coaches would sit Carter. But not Sully or the the Pens. The 82 games is when you develop… Read more »
No matter what Dan thinks? Have I ever said Carter should be in the lineup? No, but I am tired of dealing with the issue.
Pettersen: “We don’t want to lose guys in the O-zone.” Bam! Problem found. It’s not Jarry. The idea of “not sitting back” with a 2-goal lead is the problem. 4 players below the circles or close to it in the o-zone with a two goal lead in the last minutes of the 2nd period and into the third is NOT an acceptable coaching philosophy. Never was. Never will be. Find the 4th guy who commits (the irresponsible member of the party) and sit him for a few games. Watch it stop.
Truth. You can see how other teams protect leads with 4 guys back constantly, and stacking the house in front of the goalie. That is a system not autonomous player decision making. We have 3 wingers chasing out of our zone too much with the lead. MS knows this and just needs to adjust and insist all players play conservative and get back behind the blue line to protect the lead.
Here is my take on it. The Pens are a team with great skill. They have the ability to come out and get a lead with those skill players. So they have many leads in games. However they are also the oldest team in the league and they seem to be tired and get out skated in the third period. So they blow the lead. Good enough to go out in front often. But too old and tired to sustain that play so they lose a lot of games that other teams comebacks in.