Bowser Automotive
Kingerski: Chad Ruhwedel Should Replace Hunwick Permanently
Connect with us

Penguins

Kingerski: Ruhwedel Should Replace Hunwick Permanently

I was wrong. It’s Ruhwedel.

Published

on

By Michael Miller (Own work) [CC BY-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)]

Sometimes what is on the paper can be wrong.

Matt Hunwick is a more talented defenseman than Chad Ruhwedel. Hunwick is a good skater, can guard the opposing team’s best, and chip in offense. Ruhwedel is a career spare-part defenseman who has learned to manage the game.

This writer has watched Hunwick since he was 18 years old and knows what he can bring to the table. But, for unknown reasons, it hasn’t worked in Pittsburgh. Just as it didn’t work in Colorado when former head coach Patrick Roy employed an aggressive forecheck system, too.

This column tried to assure fans Hunwick would be fine. He’s more talented than the train-wreck moments which have tarred his Penguins existence. And he still is.

However, this column was wrong. I was wrong.

Hunwick isn’t the best option for the Penguins. The team is careening towards the playoffs, which begin in about a month. They have a large puzzle up front to complete. History hangs in the balance. Both sides are out of time.

And Ruhwedel is what the Penguins need right now.

On Saturday, on cue, the Pittsburgh Penguins played a structurally sound, smart hockey game. They dusted off their 2016 strategy like a golden oldie, and shot, shot and shot more against the New York Islanders. The jumped to loose pucks and didn’t panic during tense moments.

“Playing like that is a lot more fun. Guys have more juice in their legs when that stuff happens,” Ruhwedel said Saturday night.

They also simplified their defensive personnel. Hunwick sat. Ruhwedel played for the first time since December.

Injured? You need a lawyer. Call Joshua R. Lamm.

The defensive gaffes which have plagued the Penguins over the past week vanished. As forwards carried the play, defensemen didn’t take unnecessary chances or lose players in the neutral zone. Against a talented Islanders team, the Penguins took care of the defensive zone.

The defenseman kept the juice in their team’s legs, unlike the last few games.

Ruhwedel simply did his job for a team with more talent than any other team in the NHL. Simply doing the job — or doing the job simply — is good enough.

Ruhwedel Steadies Ship

Ruhwedel is not flashy. He is not big, nor is he physical. The 5-foot-11 defenseman from San Diego was a spare part on awful Buffalo Sabres teams from 2013-2016.

Ruhwedel makes simple plays: Making a quick pass forward, taking away passing lanes. Paired with Olli Maatta against the Islanders, the duo was a vanilla, no-frills defensive pairing.

Precisely what the Penguins needed.

One defensive gaffe or one lousy penalty could have changed the course of the game. The Penguins dominated the puck but were behind for most of the game. A two-goal deficit against the red-hot Islanders goalie, Christopher Gibson, could have been a disaster.

In 31 games played this season, Ruhwedel’s shot-attempt ratio (Corsi For) is nearly 53 percent. Hunwick’s is a paltry 44 percent.

Hunwick’s Year Could Be Done

Hunwick has not worked out with the Penguins, yet. He has played strings of good games. He has been quiet and efficient. And, Hunwick has played strings of terrible games. They have been catastrophic, hide-your-eyes, if-you’re-pregnant-or-have-a-heart-condition-do-not-ride-this-ride games.

Hunwick’s short-lived pairing with Jamie Oleksiak was painful. Both defenders lost their coverages, both activated at bad times, and both had high minuses hung on them. The pairing needed to vanish.

Hunwick is an 11-year NHL veteran who played some of his best hockey in last year’s playoffs for the Toronto Maple Leafs against the Washington Capitals.

But will Hunwick vanish to the press box, long-term? Yes. He may get used to press box nachos if the Penguins keep winning and Ruhwedel keeps the play simple.

Hunwick will probably get one more shot. Talent and a long track record will usually earn another shot. But just one more shot.

The fans lined up on the Fort Pitt Bridge, fearful of the Penguins demise, can breathe easier. After an ugly three-game losing streak which included losses to playoff teams in New Jersey and Boston, apprehension became outright fear.

And it all disappeared with a 50-shot win over the New York Islanders. And no defensive gaffes.

That’s all the Penguins need.

Subscribe to PHN Extra

Pittsburgh Hockey Now owner, formerly 93.7 The Fan, Sportsnet Hockey Tonight. Catch Dan tweeting @theDanKingerski and the official @pghhockeynow account.

2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Ricardo58

    March 4, 2018 at 11:28 am

    Nice article. I’ve learned to fall on the sword too as you did with your comments on Hunwick.
    I appreciate your description of D as simple, vanilla and no-frills. I think that description accurately fits last year’s D led by Hainsey, Cole and the others. Specifically D-men and prior to the recent trade, the changes this season have been return of 58 and acquisition of 22. There are no pretty losses or ugly wins in pro sports. The Pens battled during the gaffe made in OT leading to the Islander PP. Those 3 ugly losses could have led to 4 and imagine the different article put out instead. Hahaha. I guess I was one of the fans you described lined up on the bridge after the Boston beat down. I’ll gladly fall on the sword if the Pens are fortunate to advance and play the Bruins in the playoffs and win. Go Pens!

    • Dan Kingerski

      March 5, 2018 at 12:53 pm

      Thanks, Richard. I fell on the sword for everyone who wanted to remain patient…

Make your voice heard

Get PHN Extra

PHN Extra

Never Miss a Post!

Enter your email to get all of our articles sent straight to your inbox.

%d bloggers like this:

Join PHN Extra!

Join PHN Extra today for exclusive content from Dan and Shelly plus a completely Google ad-free experience.

PHN Extra

Or enter your email below to sign-up for our mailing list.

Thank you!

Something went wrong.

No thanks. I don't want.

Send this to a friend